by Swiss » Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:50 am
alex kirk wrote:Swiss wrote:yeah ive successfully avoided those for the past year. get with the program alex
Why don't you go support the oppression of Tibet, more?
-NietzscheFan123
sorry in advance for getting of topic.....
you don't even realize how flawed that example is alex/nietzschefan123. do you even know what nietzsche says? whether this oppression is right or not is a judgement reserved for traditional social morality, which should not be assumed but thrown by the wayside. the "lions" which are oppressing tibet are the way nature should be; this oppression is merely the fulfillment of man's utmost role in this world: to reach his full potential as an individual. a man who is strong should dominate the others, or "oppress" in your words.
it is amusing that as a self-proclaimed "neitzchefan" you not only lack any grasp of the beliefs and implications of these ideas put forth by neizsche, but also suffer under a delusion that contradicts itself (that the oppression of tibet is morally wrong while at the same time there is no morality). and even worse, that you blindly hold on to a theory that has been successfully challenged and largely discredited by the philosophical community.
again, get with the program. and stop being so ignorant.
/end rant
[quote="alex kirk"][quote="Swiss"]yeah ive successfully avoided those for the past year. get with the program alex[/quote]
Why don't you go support the oppression of Tibet, more?
-NietzscheFan123[/quote]
sorry in advance for getting of topic.....
you don't even realize how flawed that example is alex/nietzschefan123. do you even know what nietzsche says? whether this oppression is right or not is a judgement reserved for traditional social morality, which should not be assumed but thrown by the wayside. the "lions" which are oppressing tibet are the way nature should be; this oppression is merely the fulfillment of man's utmost role in this world: to reach his full potential as an individual. a man who is strong should dominate the others, or "oppress" in your words.
it is amusing that as a self-proclaimed "neitzchefan" you not only lack any grasp of the beliefs and implications of these ideas put forth by neizsche, but also suffer under a delusion that contradicts itself (that the oppression of tibet is morally wrong while at the same time there is no morality). and even worse, that you blindly hold on to a theory that has been successfully challenged and largely discredited by the philosophical community.
again, get with the program. and stop being so ignorant.
/end rant