1911 Beta

by **aLpha.cn-[tang]** » Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:31 pm

motive wrote:

bootstrap does all the work but it looks so stock for now :<

Hahahahahaha dat blurb...

by **Swiss** » Mon Oct 15, 2012 9:54 am

Sears wrote:Oh yeah total rip off, but is nicely done, and the the ruby on rails backend is really fast.

i personally like our banners better.

cough cough

by **mike** » Wed Oct 10, 2012 9:27 pm

It looks pretty good, motive. Hopefully someone can implement it.

by **motive** » Wed Oct 10, 2012 9:11 pm

im learning stuff

homepage, like before, but with login section to the right

homepage if you're already logged in

edit account page

posts list, regular user view

posts list, super admin view. super admin can manage everything basically.

edit post, super admin view. super admins have that "user" dropdown to reassign posts to a different author.

show post

by **motive** » Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:42 am

SpoonIsBad wrote:I do lots of php for work and have been wanting to lern ruby. Let me know if you guys need any help.

https://github.com/cgdangelo/tpg

Write shit and send in pull requests, if it doesn't suck I'll merge it in.

by **SpoonIsBad** » Tue Oct 02, 2012 6:10 pm

I do lots of php for work and have been wanting to lern ruby. Let me know if you guys need any help.

by **Sears** » Tue Oct 02, 2012 2:24 pm

Oh yeah total rip off, but is nicely done, and the the ruby on rails backend is really fast.

by **CraftyDus** » Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:36 pm

motive wrote:also that teamfortress site is the most blatant rip-off of gotfrag ever

yup

by **motive** » Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:52 am

also that teamfortress site is the most blatant rip-off of gotfrag ever

by **motive** » Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:51 am

I have no qualms about investing more time than I should to make a new league site, because I'd only do it as an excuse to learn Ruby. Whether it ever gets used or even finished is like lolwatever to me.

by **Sears** » Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:25 am

DoD in 2012 (almost 2013) doesn't need an ESEA type framework. If we had wanted to build our own esea/gotfrag type site, I would have skipped phpbb all together, and built something like the team fortress guys have in teamfortress.tv (also ruby on rails), in addition to a league component, but that was never my intention.

1911 has already grown far beyond what I ever expected it to, or wanted it to even, as my intention was just to have a throwback phpbb forum for us to use in lieu of the desserted gotfrag. It's supposed to be a little ghetto and ironic, and a throwback to the old school phpbb forum we loved (and loved to hate), we aren't supposed to be taking this too seriously.

We've flirted with starting a different league before. Ricky and I could have a new version of STA or something up and running without much more effort, but it just doesn't make sense for our community right now. People are so used to using TPG, and the time/effort/resources needed to launch a new league is totally overkill for us. It would be nice to run some cash prized "donate to play" short-season tournaments in partnership with TPG though, which is something I'm still quite interested in.

However, it is fair to say that the communities acces to the TPG side of things could be greatly improved. Like I said, I offered to take on re-designing the front-end of the TPG site over a year ago, and was flatly denied.

by **avenger** » Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:05 am

that site description and the intercontinental idiot battle killed me.

by **motive** » Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:28 am

php is entirely too dumb for me to put up with in my off time, so that means they're gonna be separate

by **CharlieGiteau** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:56 pm

Personally I think they need to remain two different entities. First, it would take an enormous amount of work, and we know people have lives outside of this. Secondly, I'd hate to see any type of "politics" go awry, and we end up with a huge cluster. There are so many more reasons that this could end badly. League site and the forums need to remain separate.

by **mike** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:26 pm

seanality wrote:why can't we tie everything into 1911 much like ESEA's website?

Might be a lot of work but def worth it in the long run.

I agree.. It would be nice to have everything in one place. Obviously, the league name would change to 1911 also which I doubt anyone has a problem with. Like you said, it could take a while with all the testing that has to go on to make sure the league part is bug free.

by **seanality** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:23 pm

why can't we tie everything into 1911 much like ESEA's website?

Might be a lot of work but def worth it in the long run.

by **Sp3c-BuLLeT** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 9:47 am

nik wrote:Call me crazy, but I think this is one of the better logo's posted sofar.
The other one (rounded shape) feels like a logo for a cs or css community (maybe because of the C shape I don't know).
Straight suits dod better. Also the order is more logical. Left-right, instead of centre - outwards.

Even better may be a simple but straightforward logo. Much like the current one but better looking.

My problem with it is that is looks like the alphabet having an orgy.

My problem with the one hisey did is it is too hard to make out the T and the G. At first glance it looks like a P in a circle, but I still like it better than the alphabet orgy.

by **nik** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 6:32 am

Sears wrote:
Sp3c-BuLLeT wrote:
billbsod wrote:I thought I remember rizzo did the tpg site, or was that a few sites ago?
He did this:

Haha.

Worst. Logo. Ever.

Call me crazy, but I think this is one of the better logo's posted sofar.
The other one (rounded shape) feels like a logo for a cs or css community (maybe because of the C shape I don't know).
Straight suits dod better. Also the order is more logical. Left-right, instead of centre - outwards.

Even better may be a simple but straightforward logo. Much like the current one but better looking.

by **motive** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:10 am

Briefly, let's go over what we need/want in a league website, whether for regular users or admins. I don't know what goes on in the backend for TPG so admins will have to fill in the blanks for me.

User registration
Multiple leagues
Player suspensions
Support ticketing system
News posts/blog thing
Match scheduling
User levels: super admin, league admins, team captains, schedulers, normal users, unregistered idiots
Match comm
Match results
Uploading screenshots/demos

New code if anyone is interested: https://github.com/cgdangelo/tpg

by **motive** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:18 pm

bootstrap does all the work but it looks so stock for now :<

by **theshizz** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 9:53 pm

Sp3c-BuLLeT wrote:
stevehisey_ wrote:
For the record I really like this

me likey

by **arnsk** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 8:21 pm

Attempted years ago, won't budge.
I supposed it also didn't help that I have zero coding knowledge, just a CS3 wizard.

by **mike** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:28 pm

I wouldn't be a fan of the new logo but the webpage and the design itself looks amazing.

by **fusioN** » Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:41 pm

like anyone is going to care that an online gaming league for day of defeat is using their name LOL

by **Sp3c-BuLLeT** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:49 pm

defrag wrote:Who owns these imaginary rights to "the proving grounds" ???

I spoke with Haiku he said there was another gaming league back in the day that claimed to have the name first, so Haiku avoided using the phrase and just went with TPG. He said that league has long sign folded and even purchased their domain name. I asked him about this whole situation when this thread got started and he told me he was going to contact a lawyer and file a trademark claim on "The Proving Grounds" for the purpose of an online gaming league. It sounds like the league has been around long enough that he shouldn't have any issues with that.

by **tenks** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:22 pm

acetamino wrote:forgot this one, tenks (which I think is the clear winner)!

I really like what you did there with Stephen Forbes. Very provocative design ace

stevehisey_ wrote:multiple designs are dubious. i see what i like and stick to it

i was kidding, but good luck with having clients and that mentality

by **acetamino** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:44 pm

forgot this one, tenks (which I think is the clear winner)!

by **stevehisey_** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:40 pm

multiple designs are dubious. i see what i like and stick to it

by **tenks** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:29 pm

I took a crack at this and made various different examples to chose from, not just one, like a real designer.

by **SKiNnTo** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:41 pm

Lots of maybes floating around, I'm getting nervous!

by **cassinoroyale** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:08 am

defrag wrote:We need something to attract new players into the league.

Quite hard I would say. There is no flow of new players around and even if we had, the skill gap between a good player to someone who never touched DoD abyssal. Suffice to say, DoD isn't even an "user friendly" game, bad engine (if compared to source/unreal engines/cryengine) since it's already part of the last decade games. Newer players are more interested in playing cool gfx games, with a cool single player mode and what not. Unfortunately, team based FPS's are slowing dying in the terms of competition (RTS's are on the rise since their broadcasted streams managed to caught up with users attention) and even CSGO is more focused on being a crossover between CS with COD rather than focusing on pure strategy that CS/DoD games developed through the years. It's unfortunate but fact is that the game peak was already achieved and given all the odds and circumstances it's amazing to have 50+ teams from USA/SA/Europe still playing DoD. I'm enjoying my last two season until I call it quits.

Moving to the thread subject, I liked hisey's ideas. Changing is good. That would sure bring a new look into the website, even though we all know we are already used with the orangey 2000's style.

Btw, chuck/ricky, I really think we could use the brand new STA environment to run the so called fast cups / night cups, having a limited number of teams in just 2, 3 matches. After TPG Classic is done, we should really start having this idea ongoing.

by **defrag** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:22 am

I agree, a website refresh is definitely needed.

Who owns these imaginary rights to "the proving grounds" ???

We need something to attract new players into the league. When eric redid 1911 and I saw it, i was super hyped and made me start playing dod again because of all the heads that were around. I had been away from dod maybe 3-4 years at that point.

Maybe the same thing will help with league play...

by **stevehisey_** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:13 am

in hisey we trust

by **ryanemo** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:49 am

i trust in steve hisey

by **rehpyc** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:59 pm

Rambizzle wrote:no 3d logo, no care. learn to 3d steve.

I think you mean 3D that spins and shoots fireworks out its sides

by **Sp3c-BuLLeT** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 8:14 pm

stevehisey_ wrote:i like that second logo a little better... but maybe i could make the line in the P go out a little farther to the left?

Whatever you think will work. I trust your judgement

by **joeledmunds** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 8:12 pm

Rambizzle wrote:no 3d logo, no care. learn to 3d steve.

|3d|Rambizzeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Yeah, hisey's logos are pretty sexy, and I love skinntos paint brainstorms haha.

by **nunz** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:56 pm

unreal design. I cant understand for the life of me why someone would not want to update their website... if the guy is this stubborn it might be time to put him in his place and just move on from them.

by **Rambizzle** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:29 pm

no 3d logo, no care. learn to 3d steve.

by **stevehisey_** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:55 pm

Sp3c-BuLLeT wrote:
stevehisey_ wrote:
scorch- wrote:the middle letter of the logo is a conflation of 't' and 'P'
^this
Not saying these look good. You could do better, but do you think there is a way to make the T stand out more such as a second color or adding spacing between the T and P?

i like that second logo a little better... but maybe i could make the line in the P go out a little farther to the left?

by **Sp3c-BuLLeT** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:52 pm

stevehisey_ wrote:

For the record I really like this

by **Sp3c-BuLLeT** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:50 pm

stevehisey_ wrote:
scorch- wrote:the middle letter of the logo is a conflation of 't' and 'P'
^this

Not saying these look good. You could do better, but do you think there is a way to make the T stand out more such as a second color or adding spacing between the T and P?

by **SKiNnTo** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:45 pm

Some terrible paint logos to spark some more ideas!

by **Sears** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:43 pm

Sp3c-BuLLeT wrote:
billbsod wrote:I thought I remember rizzo did the tpg site, or was that a few sites ago?
He did this:

Haha.

Worst. Logo. Ever.

by **Sears** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:21 pm

motive wrote:I had started working on this a while back (for STA) but I never followed through with it: https://github.com/cgdangelo/staleague.org I think I finished the user profile pages (viewing, updating fields, etc.) and quit.

In my limited free time I've been messing around with making a new league atop Ruby on Rails, because I am fucking sick of PHP and how bad it is. I'm down for moving forward with it; I'll probably be doing it anyway just to get a handle on the language and framework.

I'd be down for this, ruby > php.

by **stevehisey_** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:05 pm

scorch- wrote:the middle letter of the logo is a conflation of 't' and 'P'

^this

by **motive** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:04 pm

I had started working on this a while back (for STA) but I never followed through with it: https://github.com/cgdangelo/staleague.org I think I finished the user profile pages (viewing, updating fields, etc.) and quit.

In my limited free time I've been messing around with making a new league atop Ruby on Rails, because I am fucking sick of PHP and how bad it is. I'm down for moving forward with it; I'll probably be doing it anyway just to get a handle on the language and framework.

by **scorch-** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:02 pm

the middle letter of the logo is a conflation of 't' and 'P'

by **Sp3c-BuLLeT** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:56 pm

Sears wrote:There was no reason for them to drop "the proving grounds", and Snipper essentially got trolled pretty hard. The only registered trademark for "the proving grounds" I think is some construction company in kentucky or something, and I think the trademark expired years ago.

If this is true I don't mind putting the words "The Proving Grounds" in there. I would like to see the T in the logo though since the league is TPG and not PG.

The way the site was written the content that gets pushed to the site is expecting certain dimensions from the banner, menu, etc... What would be easiest for me is if any new banner were the same size or smaller as the existing banners. If they are bigger then it will take me more work to change them out. Not saying I won't just saying same size and smaller is as simple as copying a file for me.

by **Sp3c-BuLLeT** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:51 pm

billbsod wrote:I thought I remember rizzo did the tpg site, or was that a few sites ago?

He did this:

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: new TPG webdesign