Re: Potential Lan Ideas
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:57 am
So you think he's a hipster poser?
Relax, lounge around, and find out who hacks.
https://beta.nineteeneleven.gg/forums/
I think the ones in that picture fell apart a year or two ago. That picture is from 2008 :}Swiss wrote:actually can i step in here. i must say that alex's avatar is close to hipster but does raise a few questions regarding the level of hipster-ness:
exhibit A) the converse are not dirty enough nor are they close to falling apart.
exhibit B) although the jeans are well worn they are not skinny jeans or even slim fit, a questionable hipster choice
another question: what is the wood that you are resting your shoes on? it looks almost like a church pew, and if so, then definitely hipster. i would applaud you.
I feel like you didn't read a fucking word I said. No surprise here. Also abundantly clear that you don't know what "hipster" means and you just toss it around like everyone else these days. As if anyone who makes a point of contention = hipster.Polak wrote:hipster move: who tries to make an argument about people that have passed away. Some of the players that passed I personally didn't know. However, I won't go out of my way to say that I don't know them and then argue about why I shouldn't remember them on other peoples terms.
People who have come and gone from this community, whether you knew them or not, they were still part of this community that you are still part of. If somehow they came back, which some have been doing, there will always be a open door. Even when there's a lot of dirty shit behind that door.
I'm inconsiderate, immature, and a hipster. All because I said I would feel awkward tagging up [ox] in a DoD match. Not that I bashed on the idea of OTHER people doing it, or bashed the man himself, or the fact that we're already donating to a fund in his name. No. Me saying that I would feel weird putting up the front that I knew ox by tagging up his name, something that is probably more reserved for people who actually knew him, makes me an inconsiderate hipster.rehpyc wrote:So because someone didn't know a guy, and he doesn't see why he personally would have the need to tag the guy in remembrance, he's a hipster? lol..
I've known him since 2005. I guess I figured he'd come around eventually :\rehpyc wrote:it's not like you or I expected logic from Polak, though
I wasn't complaining. But at least your excuse is better than tenks' if you actually didn't read what I said. All I said is, "it might be weird..."Polak wrote:And I enjoy being dumb over the internet, my life has come down to being a professional adult. So i like to just barf out retarded crap as much as I can. I actually didn't read any of kirks posts I just saw him complaining
~mainstream = hipsterrehpyc wrote:what is a professional adult? why have you always enjoyed portraying yourself as dumb over the internet? how did you gather that kirk was 'complaining' if you didn't read his posts? we're still wondering how creating argument makes one a hipster.
ANSWERS.
Snapshot taken. I always knew you was a hipster, Alex. And no matter what excuses you may say, I'd probably take out of context your first sentence and use against you! I suppose you are terrified. If not, you ought to be! mwahahaalex kirk wrote:I'm inconsiderate, immature, and a hipster. All because I said I would feel awkward tagging up [ox] in a DoD match. Not that I bashed on the idea of OTHER people doing it, or bashed the man himself, or the fact that we're already donating to a fund in his name. No. Me saying that I would feel weird putting up the front that I knew ox by tagging up his name, something that is probably more reserved for people who actually knew him, makes me an inconsiderate hipster.rehpyc wrote:So because someone didn't know a guy, and he doesn't see why he personally would have the need to tag the guy in remembrance, he's a hipster? lol..
Tenks said it best: nothing changes in posting on DoD forums. Unfortunately for him, that statement applies to him and not me.
Screenshotted!cassinoroyale wrote:Cowboys' butts drive me nuts.
WTF! That's very low brah!alex kirk wrote:Screenshotted!cassinoroyale wrote:Cowboys' butts drive me nuts.
hipsters actually dont need to argue for the most part, they enjoy their place outside of society and therefore have little to argue about unless it is about the environment, organic food, obscure novels/books/artists/bands, or philosophy (you have to agree with me on the last one, alex)polak wrote:hipster move: who tries to make an argument about people that have passed away. Some of the players that passed I personally didn't know. However, I won't go out of my way to say that I don't know them and then argue about why I shouldn't remember them on other peoples terms.
this is much more fitting. but in this context, "jackass" may be a better choice in words. JK I <3 you kirkalex kirk wrote:I'm inconsiderate, immature, and a hipster.
actually thats a great point you just made. so apparently you arent completely off the deep end in terms of your hipsternessalex kirk wrote:Most hipsters don't know shit about philosophy, which is why they love Nietzsche. I think their aim is more to know as little about everything possible as to appear to be cultured rather than actually trying to learn it. "Superficial learning," if you will.
Who was your professor, Char?alex kirk wrote:Don't argue with me, folks, I took a class on formal logic freshman year of college.
I KNOW IT'S A GREAT POINT. NOT ONLY BECAUSE IT'S TRUE, BUT BECAUSE I CAME UP WITH IT.Swiss wrote:actually thats a great point you just made. so apparently you arent completely off the deep end in terms of your hipsterness
I think anyone who read that thread would see I took him to school, and not the other way around.CharlieGiteau wrote:Who was your professor, Char?
i see what you did there...alex kirk wrote:I think anyone who read that thread would see I took him to school, and not the other way around.
Obviously did not take a course in geography or correct pronunciation of the Appalachian mountain system.alex kirk wrote:
Don't argue with me, folks, I took a class on formal logic freshman year of college.
Apple-eh-shun. The "shun" can be replaced with "shin," too. My girlfriend makes me say it for her amusement. She's very cruel.Miller` wrote:Obviously did not take a course in geography or correct pronunciation of the Appalachian mountain system.
alex kirk wrote:Apple-eh-shun. The "shun" can be replaced with "shin," too. My girlfriend makes me say it for her amusement. She's very cruel.

I thought you were above petty mother insults, Sears.Sears wrote:[img]http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media ... 00.png[img]
[youtube]1w3CdcDA08c[/youtube]alex kirk wrote:I thought you were above petty mother insults, Sears.
so i REALLY wanted cereal. got the bowl. got the cereal. was ready to go....then i realized i didnt have a spoon, i dont think you can imagine how disappointed i was.Swiss wrote:sing it kelly

Golden. You don't understand.....im proud of that status. I ate like half a box of frosted flakes. That's almost as bad as mista on one of his binge dayslolinus wrote:so i REALLY wanted cereal. got the bowl. got the cereal. was ready to go....then i realized i didnt have a spoon, i dont think you can imagine how disappointed i was.Swiss wrote:sing it kelly
So to sumarize your day?Swiss wrote:Golden. You don't understand.....im proud of that status. I ate like half a box of frosted flakes. That's almost as bad as mista on one of his binge dayslolinus wrote:so i REALLY wanted cereal. got the bowl. got the cereal. was ready to go....then i realized i didnt have a spoon, i dont think you can imagine how disappointed i was.Swiss wrote:sing it kelly


i take that as a complimentalex kirk wrote:Wow, half a box of cereal...I guess that's impressive for a prepubescent 12 year old girl after volleyball practice.
Well you shouldn't. Because I'm implying that you have a very young vagina.Swiss wrote:i take that as a compliment
i was being completely serious alexalex kirk wrote:Well you shouldn't. Because I'm implying that you have a very young vagina.Swiss wrote:i take that as a compliment
Good, because this is a completely serious topic.Swiss wrote:i was being completely serious alex
it would make good sense to come together and pay our respects to a fallen and liked member of our community.
that and any other soldats that have passed
alex kirk wrote:rehpyc wrote:
Tenks said it best: nothing changes in posting on DoD forums. Unfortunately for him, that statement applies to him and not me.

Clearly, you know nothing about me. Just because you're apparently easy to troll doesn't mean I contribute nothing to this community, nor does it mean I'm trying to impress anyone.tenks wrote:Alex, you're a tool. You were a tool on the old forums and you're just as much of a tool on these forums. Like I said, nothing has changed. You bring nothing to this community other than a billion posts that have nothing to do with anything other than you trying to impress everyone. You voice your opinion just so you can make another post. You don't even really give a shit about the topic. Are you even going to show up to this LAN? 9/10 of your posts arent even about Dod or the community. And thats whats never changed. I kinda stepped away from the community for a bit and every so often when I checked back on the forums...it'd just be 1,000 douchebag posts with you and those other two idiots debating politics and arguing with people for the sake of arguing...accomplishing nothing but making the community less desirable to be apart of. Why do you think Sears re-started 1911? Because gotfrag turned into a giant piece of shit because of people like you and he wanted to bring the REAL community back to DoD. Unfortunately you came along too.
Everything about my statement applies solely to you. I can dig up of any of your millions of posts from the last 2 years, and they will all be about the same old bs. This thread is a perfect example.
When he ignorantly presumed your intentions for recreating 1911.Sears wrote:How did I get roped into any of this?
HMMM. What venue are we talking here? If it's outdoor, pz out LAN.Swiss wrote:OK.....
so back on topic. i have a potential lan idea: lets make it so that the lan is on the same day as an arcade fire concert in chicago so we can see where kirks true devotion lies
I'm not trying to battle for supreme ventrilo crew in DoD. Tenks said I have contributed nothing to this community when in reality I have owned a ventrilo that served as a staple of the DoD community for a total of ~5-6 years. I give a channel to anyone who asks (even people I don't like), I give my server/vent rcon out to responsible people so 12mans/matches/scrims can be played even if my team is not present. This among the other things I listed, of course.dane wrote:the only real and main ventrilo for dod was RVC and that dated back before 2005. Tenks was an honorary member at times so we could get some dota/dod pugs going. checkmate or whatever is/was a lame knockoff. GOOD DAY SIR.
On the forum, right. Got it. Funny lie is funny.alex kirk wrote:But I act like a sarcastic ass on the forum, therefore I'm worthless. Got it. Strong logic is strong.
Oh look, no evidence being brought forth on your post, Kevin. Obviously your word is too unreliable and can't be used against me.stealthlol wrote:On the forum, right. Got it. Funny lie is funny.
And dammit I'm awesome at it. I was a not-a-hipster-but-do-slightly-behave-like-one before it was cool and mainstream.cassinoroyale wrote:Don't listen to alex kirk guys, he obviously didn't put a lot effort when he studied in the St. Logical Landus School. Back then, he was more focused on how he could be the 1st I'm-not-a-hipster-but-I-do-slightly-behave-like-one.