1911 Beta

Just kinda wanted to throw this out there and see what y'all think..Shiz and I were talking about a personal DoD movie competition but I started thinking it'd be fun to have more than just between us. Kinda spice things up a little bit around here..like the region's cup or draft etc...I was thinking It'd be a heads up 1v1 kinda thing, like once ever 2-3 weeks or month? (enough time to gather clips and make it). The competitors would get all the same clips and its up to them to edit and make something cool with it. Community votes on the winner, poll based format. Winner moves on to the next round..

I assume there'd be a limited # of people doing this, like maybe 4..so it'd only be a few rounds..Could turn out kinda cool.


thoughts?

I won't make movies, but I will vote. Cool idea.

I'd be downz

sure

and so the four people are here. hahaha

Good idea if you can find the moviemakers.

Cool idea. I call being able to submit a clip

Why not use fotw's for the footage? Then you can get plenty to work with and we can get some to watch this season.

We were supposed to have fotw's last season but I believe none of them went through either for the moviemakers being busy or because they didn't received good clips to work on. I support this idea, lets see how our Camerons, Spielbergs, Bays, Shyamalans, etc will do!

Good idea.

People should upload timed demos(and ts3/vent recording if possible).
Is there any rules right now or is it "you're free to do what the hell you want to do"? (solo/duo/team movies? Mininum/Max length of the movie? etc)

neat idea tenks.

i bet we could have at least 6 solid moviemakers in this.

put me on the list as a movie maker!

Nice idea. If that goes forward, i'll participate to.

MEGANFOX wrote:Nice idea. If that goes forward, i'll participate to.

dustin young citing? Sorry he's not allowed to participate.

siXten wrote:Good idea.

thanks. the only kind I have

siXten wrote: People should upload timed demos(and ts3/vent recording if possible).
Is there any rules right now or is it "you're free to do what the hell you want to do"? (solo/duo/team movies? Mininum/Max length of the movie? etc)

I haven't put too much thought into it, but I think the only necessary rule is that everyone uses/has access to all the same ingredients. clips/times/vent recordings etc. Just like Iron Chef. Its up to the chef to make the final dish.

I don't think there should be really any other rules..at least that I can think of at the top of my head...not even a time limit. Well maybe a generic one, like "dont go over 10 minutes" or something..

little mornin wake and bake just opened up the flow of creativity to my brain...


As far as rules/voting...Im digging the whole Iron Chef set up. A simple poll vote won't do...

How about a few categories (scoring 1 out of of 10) to be judged on?

Quality (like taste the most important, simply was the movie good/entertaining)
A/V sync (self-explanitory)
Presentation (basically style/effects/prettyness)
Originality (speaks for itself)

thoughts?

tenks wrote: I haven't put too much thought into it, but I think the only necessary rule is that everyone uses/has access to all the same ingredients. clips/times/vent recordings etc. Just like Iron Chef. Its up to the chef to make the final dish.

I don't think there should be really any other rules..at least that I can think of at the top of my head...not even a time limit. Well maybe a generic one, like "dont go over 10 minutes" or something..

Yeah, I agree with you! Every team should record vent/ts3 for a few matches under this season(2-4 people/team. Not good if the guy that records start having trouble with anything without warning and it's not recording anything), and than it's up to the judges to pick demos from a few matches.

tenks wrote:little mornin wake and bake just opened up the flow of creativity to my brain...


As far as rules/voting...Im digging the whole Iron Chef set up. A simple poll vote won't do...

How about a few categories (scoring 1 out of of 10) to be judged on?

Quality (like taste the most important, simply was the movie good/entertaining)
A/V sync (self-explanitory)
Presentation (basically style/effects/prettyness)
Originality (speaks for itself)

thoughts?

I'll fuckin lose on quality and presentation(specially effects)

Also we maybe should have

Music ( If the person who watch the movie enjoy the music or think it's crap)

I'm in

why don't we start by doing like a clip contest... of like one of our favorite clips of all time. We could search 1911 forums and gotfrag forums for old demos and use whatever we want. Like if I were to remake dan "scorch" schey's 9 kill streak on harrington against pandemic.

I think everyone should submit clips to this thread after next weeks matches and maybe one fotw will be completed

I still have my Anzio/Chemille FOTW, its almost done but I gave up lolol ;(
Maybe I'll find the courage to finish and release this piece of dump soon.

tenks wrote:

MEGANFOX wrote:Nice idea. If that goes forward, i'll participate to.

dustin young citing? Sorry he's not allowed to participate.

That's my euro teammate 3vans.

k4b00m wrote:

tenks wrote:

MEGANFOX wrote:Nice idea. If that goes forward, i'll participate to.

dustin young citing? Sorry he's not allowed to participate.

That's my euro teammate 3vans.

sorry, one can never be too careful! If we let him enter, he'll say he'll make a movie just to troll us and it will never be made.


I personally wouldn't want this to turn into a frags of the week vid contest because we're limited to only the current clips that are produced (the pool of talent is less these days) and also some people's movie style might be more than just a strait frag movie..Like myself.


I personally don't think music should be a category that is judged, it should just kinda fall under A/V sync....I say that because you can have an amazing video. editing/presenstation/sfx etc...But then if the person hates your taste in music, or just happens to dislike the song you used, they'll down rate/vote you. Its hard to please everyone with music..

It's really not even fair to let Steve participate... he's on another level with his pristine intro making capabilities

Rambizzle wrote:It's really not even fair to let Steve participate... he's on another level with his pristine intro making capabilities

yea, well you're just going to have to sit tight then ricky..











p.s. All movies should be rendered out in at least 720p

I thought the point was for everyone to be working with the EXACT same footage. I feel as though a few of you kinda missed out on that point.

Neat idea, here's my two cents.

1. Like Corey said, the footage pool or whatever would have to be the same for all competitors. As much as I love some of the older rapeage clips like scorch destroying pandemic or kellen killing everything, I'm a bit burnt out on reused footage. Therefore why not make it a glorified FOTW over two or three weeks of footage. Take submissions, select 10 or however many clips to be used for everyone, then get at it.

2. OR you guys could go a different direction and each make a two week FOTW. Arcane Studios used to make some really good FOTWs back in the day, it almost felt like a mini competition between some of their staff. Since there were four contestants (I think) wouldn't that fit perfectly over an 8 week season? I guess that's not ideal since it would be harder to judge if someone got shafted with a chemille/solitude combo vesus a harrington/rr2 or something along those lines.

These two ways would guarantee new footage and plenty of HLTVs and possibly vent recordings/shoutcasts though. Whatever's decided I'll gladly submit to

JaGGoNdd wrote:I thought the point was for everyone to be working with the EXACT same footage. I feel as though a few of you kinda missed out on that point.

I dunno if you were refering to me corey, but that's exactly what I said, everyone gets the same footage and has to use that footage..As far as the old footage comment, it's not like if one person has clips, they can't upload and share it for everyone. I dont see how that changes anything?

tenks wrote: The competitors would get all the same clips and its up to them to edit and make something cool with it.

tenks wrote:I haven't put too much thought into it, but I think the only necessary rule is that everyone uses/has access to all the same ingredients. clips/times/vent recordings etc. Just like Iron Chef. Its up to the chef to make the final dish.

Tony I can see how older footage might be boring for some..I understand that...But I think the simpler we make this, the better chance it will actually happen and finish. Tying in with it being a FOTW really limits things and ties us down to whatever TPG is doing at the moment and what their schedule is...And the potential of FF's shitty clips etc. People not submitting...We should just get clips that are already out there.

A set amount of clips should be decided upon by the contestants/community/whoever. And if this is successful maybe it can expand..But I think we should just chose some of the top of the top clips out there from the best players.



other thoughts on some rules:

-720p minimum
-when judged/voted upon the videos shouldn't be labeled with who made them. that way there is no bias
-no country music

tenks wrote: -no country music

Holy shit this.

mogers wrote:

tenks wrote: -no country music

Holy shit this.

fuck. count me out.

Rambizzle wrote:

mogers wrote:

tenks wrote: -no country music

Holy shit this.

fuck. count me out.

hahahahahahaha. dying right now

tenks wrote: sorry, one can never be too careful! If we let him enter, he'll say he'll make a movie just to troll us and it will never be made.


I personally wouldn't want this to turn into a frags of the week vid contest because we're limited to only the current clips that are produced (the pool of talent is less these days) and also some people's movie style might be more than just a strait frag movie..Like myself.


I personally don't think music should be a category that is judged, it should just kinda fall under A/V sync....I say that because you can have an amazing video. editing/presenstation/sfx etc...But then if the person hates your taste in music, or just happens to dislike the song you used, they'll down rate/vote you. Its hard to please everyone with music..

If u let me in, ofc i will do the movie. I understand u dont know me, u dont know if i know how to make a movie. So i let u here 4 links.

My movie - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxTUNVRMl0c

S3T3 Movie - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-yizU-v6o8

2 tests movie to see the quality and some effects - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcdT-VQlVC8 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=en ... uBez4TtjQo

i already won. thanks to everyone for coming out. gg.

MEGANFOX wrote:

tenks wrote: sorry, one can never be too careful! If we let him enter, he'll say he'll make a movie just to troll us and it will never be made.


I personally wouldn't want this to turn into a frags of the week vid contest because we're limited to only the current clips that are produced (the pool of talent is less these days) and also some people's movie style might be more than just a strait frag movie..Like myself.


I personally don't think music should be a category that is judged, it should just kinda fall under A/V sync....I say that because you can have an amazing video. editing/presenstation/sfx etc...But then if the person hates your taste in music, or just happens to dislike the song you used, they'll down rate/vote you. Its hard to please everyone with music..

If u let me in, ofc i will do the movie. I understand u dont know me, u dont know if i know how to make a movie. So i let u here 4 links.

My movie - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxTUNVRMl0c

S3T3 Movie - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-yizU-v6o8

2 tests movie to see the quality and some effects - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcdT-VQlVC8 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=en ... uBez4TtjQo

Nah its cool bro, I'm sure you're good. I was just joking. THere is a guy who always promises to make people's movies but dissapears and never does, trolling whoever. He always aliases and I saw that you had a low post-count so I was joking that you were him.

-720p minimum
-when judged/voted upon the videos shouldn't be labeled with who made them. that way there is no bias
-no country music

Jason good thinking for allowing no names, it would be interesting to see if our community can figure out who makes what based on individual editing styles. Although the HD idea is nice, people such as myself (although I won't be participating) have pretty issues like space requirements or an older computer. I can't really get past rendering in 1024x600 as an example.

ao_ wrote:

-720p minimum
-when judged/voted upon the videos shouldn't be labeled with who made them. that way there is no bias
-no country music

Jason good thinking for allowing no names, it would be interesting to see if our community can figure out who makes what based on individual editing styles. Although the HD idea is nice, people such as myself (although I won't be participating) have pretty issues like space requirements or an older computer. I can't really get past rendering in 1024x600 as an example.

It would be interesting to see if people could figure out who did what, but the main point is you're voting on the video not the person who made it.

Yea the 720p was more wishful thinking on my part. Im a snob when it comes to that stuff. I figured everyone who could and IS making movies of any kind would be doing so at least 720p/HD at this point in time. But I defiantly don't want to make a rule that would prevent someone from participating, that's not my style (cough tpg).

I also thought it was necessary because I'm afraid someone might get a lower score/vote just cause they have a lower resolution video. I can see someone making a badass edit and rendering it out at 800x600 and losing to a mediocre edit at 1080p just because the 1080p would look cleaner and nicer..I was just trying to make the playing field as even and as fair as possible.

tenks wrote:

ao_ wrote:

-720p minimum
-when judged/voted upon the videos shouldn't be labeled with who made them. that way there is no bias
-no country music

Jason good thinking for allowing no names, it would be interesting to see if our community can figure out who makes what based on individual editing styles. Although the HD idea is nice, people such as myself (although I won't be participating) have pretty issues like space requirements or an older computer. I can't really get past rendering in 1024x600 as an example.

It would be interesting to see if people could figure out who did what, but the main point is you're voting on the video not the person who made it.

Cutting out the names of who made something would also remove biases towards voting. I'm assuming, as this is completely for fun and nobody has anything to gain, you wouldn't run the risk of somebody telling others to vote for them.

would we all use the same agreed upon crosshair? cuz I know jaggon loves his movie crosshair and I have a slightly different one than seven's white crosshair ;p

stealthlol wrote: Cutting out the names of who made something would also remove biases towards voting. I'm assuming, as this is completely for fun and nobody has anything to gain, you wouldn't run the risk of somebody telling others to vote for them.

I can't tell if you're for or against it, but yes that's the point, removing biased towards voting. It doesn't matter if its for fun or not, people are people, and they will find a way to gain an advantage. In this case getting all their friends to vote for them.

People play dod for fun, there is nothing to gain from that either, yet people still hack and cheat.

Cutting the names from submitted videos won't hurt anything, so I don't see why it shouldn't be considered. If anything it prevents this from turning into a popularity contest.

k4b00m wrote:would we all use the same agreed upon crosshair? cuz I know jaggon loves his movie crosshair and I have a slightly different one than seven's white crosshair ;p

I dont think that matters

tenks wrote:

k4b00m wrote:would we all use the same agreed upon crosshair? cuz I know jaggon loves his movie crosshair and I have a slightly different one than seven's white crosshair ;p

I dont think that matters

Yeah, only reason being if you don't want the voters to know who made what, it's a dead give away what video jaggon made, he's the only one that uses that bigger white crosshair. Not a huge deal to me though just throwing that out there.

k4b00m wrote:

tenks wrote:

k4b00m wrote:would we all use the same agreed upon crosshair? cuz I know jaggon loves his movie crosshair and I have a slightly different one than seven's white crosshair ;p

I dont think that matters

Yeah, only reason being if you don't want the voters to know who made what, it's a dead give away what video jaggon made, he's the only one that uses that bigger white crosshair. Not a huge deal to me though just throwing that out there.

haha, I didn't even think about that. That goes to show you how many dod movies I've actually watched start to finish (maybe 1 or 2) and paid attention to. They all look the same to me, no offense, just frags to music. Nothing has really stood out to me in years, except maybe Mutiny 2?

When you've made over a dozen movies you start to notice the small things

I can provide footage if someone wants it. 10 years of dod, still no movie

I would do this if it wasn't too long. Few minute movie maybe

Fully expect this song to be used in this movie contest

[youtube]TWHNr0BrNgo[/youtube]

Manner wrote:I can provide footage if someone wants it. 10 years of dod, still no movie

Hail for the 2 digit steam guy!

milo wrote:Fully expect this song to be used in this movie contest

[youtube]TWHNr0BrNgo[/youtube]

haha I'm acutally using that for one of the video's Im working on for my job..toofunny

just figured out my track list for this.

you guys are dead.










It's very complicated. You might think it's a snap, a snap to make a rap. Well if you do, me and my crew will tell you that's some crap.

anyone want to make my movie?

Beas wrote:anyone want to make my movie?

$

stevehisey_ wrote:

Beas wrote:anyone want to make my movie?

$

how much? i should get a discount haha

bump


add your name to the list if you're serious about wanting to partake in this as a maker

Brandon
Chris
Corey
Jason
Joey
Steve
Paul
MeganFox