1911 Beta

Posted: **Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:39 am**

So what do our community members use.

Intel i7, i5, i3 etc..

or AMD?

I have an AMD Phenom II X4 965. I have been wanting to switch to intel for a decade now but I haven't yet..

Posted: **Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:41 am**

Intel i7 2600k.

I believe Intel CPUs run hotter than AMD and AMD is slower in general although that is not always the case. Having used both Intel and AMD CPUs in the past, I do prefer Intel.

Posted: **Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:52 am**

What are you going to use your computer to?

I don't really think you should upgrade to a I7 cpu or I5 if it's only for gaming.

I have also a AMD Phenom cpu, but 955 and I think it's good, but I want to play with higher settings in BF3 and for using 3D/video/photoprograms in high quality.

But if you really want to

Buy a I7-3770K - Buy the damn "K" model, so you can overclock later and don't ffs say you are not going to overclock.. Who knows? Maybe a month later you want to try overclock, but then you bought wrong cpu

Posted: **Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:55 am**

I'm still running my intel Q6600. Upgrade to 3570k or 3770k is inbound though.

Posted: **Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:06 am**

Commodore.

Posted: **Fri Sep 28, 2012 2:40 pm**

Intel i5 - 2500k @ 3.30GHz

Posted: **Fri Sep 28, 2012 3:02 pm**

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz

Posted: **Fri Sep 28, 2012 3:19 pm**

AMD Phenom II x6 1045T 2.7 ghz

I almost always go with AMD, they seem to have the best bang-for-your-buck if you are buying a slightly older model.

That + HD 6850 has me at a constant frame rate for every game I've played lately. (D3, borderlands 2, skyrim, mw3, etc)

This site is great for comparing price:performance ratio of CPUs and GPUs

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/

Posted: **Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:45 pm**

i7-3770k at 4.5GHz

Nothing beats the value of a OC'd i5-2500k IMO. If you live near a Microcenter, its real cheap there.

Posted: **Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:04 pm**

I'm running an i5-2500k at 3.30 ghz, turbo to 3.7.

I used an AMD in my last build, but for this one, the new AMD chips didn't seem to be keeping up with the Intel chips.

Posted: **Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:58 pm**

phenom II 955. works great, was 120 or so less than the intel that compared at the time. ive never had an intel system i built, always AMD.

Posted: **Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:14 pm**

My phenom 2 955 has been running strong for the past 3 years. If you are on a budget then get a 955 or 965 (965 is just an overclocked 955 which over clocking the 955 to 3.2 is really easy). If it's mainly for gaming go for the 955 or 965 and hook yourself up with a killer graphics card. Get the I7 if your gonna be doing a lot of movie editing/multi tasking big programs and what not.

Posted: **Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:16 am**

I use a 3570K i5 @ 3.4GHz turbo to 3.8GHz and it easily runs all my games, apps, etc without breaking a sweat. In the past I would have said AMD had the best bang for the buck but with the new generation i3 chips costing only $130 I don't really think that is the case anymore. Really depends on what you are using it for and how much you want to pay. Also, I've heard that any of the i5 non-K chips can handle much faster frequencies without overheating issues.

Posted: **Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:13 pm**

Mid-range with a high-range GPU > high-range CPU with a mid-range GPU for gaming.

Posted: **Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:36 pm**

Cage wrote:Intel i5 - 2500k @ 3.30GHz

Posted: **Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:04 pm**

rehpyc wrote:Mid-range with a high-range GPU > high-range CPU with a mid-range GPU for gaming.

I always read that CPUs end up bottle necking GPUs, therefore, capping the true capability of the GPU. Wouldn't it be a waste of money to do this?

Posted: **Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:27 pm**

I'm not good or smart enough to unlock the true potential of these CPUs. Therefore I just buy stock computers at wal-mart.

Posted: **Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:43 pm**

after the research i did and asking around during my new computer build a couple weeks ago, it looks like intel is the best way to go for gaming as long as you can afford it. if you are on a tight budget, amd will get you more for your money. i ended up going with i5 3750 and its flying so far.

Posted: **Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:07 pm**

I have an i7 2600k oc'd to 4.2ghz on STOCK AIR, lewls. The bridges are best. Ivy is younger but damn can Sandy get dowwn.

amd is bishop.

Posted: **Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:18 pm**

tenks wrote:I have an i7 2600k oc'd to 4.2ghz on STOCK AIR, lewls. The bridges are best. Ivy is younger but damn can Sandy get dowwn.

amd is bishop.

what temps does it run on full load? haha. fucking socal heat giving us high ambient temps to work with :[ went watercooling ages ago so that my comp can be oc'd to its max and be completely silent instead of a turbine engine when putting the cpu/gpu on heavy loads :\

Posted: **Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:48 pm**

rehpyc wrote:
tenks wrote:I have an i7 2600k oc'd to 4.2ghz on STOCK AIR, lewls. The bridges are best. Ivy is younger but damn can Sandy get dowwn.

amd is bishop.
what temps does it run on full load? haha. fucking socal heat giving us high ambient temps to work with :[ went watercooling ages ago so that my comp can be oc'd to its max and be completely silent instead of a turbine engine when putting the cpu/gpu on heavy loads :\

I actually finally turned off the OC a week ago. the socal heat/ambient temps was exactly my problem too and I just wanted to be safe.

I dont really have many games, but i play Dota 2 @ 2560 x 1600 fully maxed settings, which is pretty intense..I'd say maybe it gets up to 75 on full load, and when it was hot during the day maybe 80-81 a few times..But this is Intel stock cooling though so Im pretty impressed. And from what I've read, its pretty common for people to run sandy at 4.5-4.8 on air, which is retarded and amazing at the same time.

Posted: **Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:11 am**

I'm still running a e6600 @ 3.6 and volt modded 5850. Just hasn't been practical to upgrade when I can still play games at 1920x1080 :[

Posted: **Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:38 am**

I have a Phenom 1100T sitting at 4.5ghz w/ a 6850. Both of which are on water; Phenom doesn't break 50 degrees under full load.

Posted: **Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:15 am**

intel 2600k. used to be an amd fanboy but when i went to buy a new machine last year, there's really no comparison. amd doesn't even make their processors super cheap to compensate for the fact that intel's tech is way better at this point.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2012 3:39 pm**

If you go with an intel i7 2600k, get a different heatsink or cooling device. The stock one IS shit.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2012 5:51 pm**

Intel i7 2600K watercooled with an h100 corsair, Overclocked to 4.4ghz.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:49 pm**

Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz 2.00 GHz

Posted: **Thu Oct 04, 2012 12:54 am**

CharlieGiteau wrote:
rehpyc wrote:Mid-range with a high-range GPU > high-range CPU with a mid-range GPU for gaming.
I always read that CPUs end up bottle necking GPUs, therefore, capping the true capability of the GPU. Wouldn't it be a waste of money to do this?

This is a thing of the past and is no longer true. Modern cpu's are no longer a bottleneck, but every scenario and game is different. Sean was just saying in general, its better to invest more $$ into a good gpu than a good CPU for gaming. It's not absolute, just a best price/performance.

Posted: **Thu Oct 04, 2012 7:25 am**

Ken wrote:If you go with an intel i7 2600k, get a different heatsink or cooling device. The stock one IS shit.

stock one is fine if you're not OC'ing.

Posted: **Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:26 am**

Dan you're needed in the shootmania battlefield . Brandon is not pleased with you!

Posted: **Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:59 am**

I should be home around 9pdt tonight

1911 Beta

Intel or AMD

Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD

Re: Intel or AMD