FUCKING YES DOUBLE ELIMINATION.
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 12:18 pm
LETS DO IT.
Relax, lounge around, and find out who hacks.
https://beta.nineteeneleven.gg/forums/



thistoxinatoR wrote:Double Elimination turns 3 weeks of playoffs into 6 weeks. Seems a tad too long considering it's a 10 week season. Invite looks like it might be down to 6 teams soon.. Imo. Best of 3 for finals.. First two matches get played on the first sunday and if a 3rd is needed it gets played the next week.
sevEN wrote:thistoxinatoR wrote:Double Elimination turns 3 weeks of playoffs into 6 weeks. Seems a tad too long considering it's a 10 week season. Invite looks like it might be down to 6 teams soon.. Imo. Best of 3 for finals.. First two matches get played on the first sunday and if a 3rd is needed it gets played the next week.
thistoxinatoR wrote: Imo. Best of 3 for finals.. First two matches get played on the first sunday and if a 3rd is needed it gets played the next week.
wut. Why would you want to make it any longer?toxinatoR wrote:Double Elimination turns 3 weeks of playoffs into 6 weeks. Seems a tad too long considering it's a 10 week season. Invite looks like it might be down to 6 teams soon.. Imo. Best of 3 for finals.. First two matches get played on the first sunday and if a 3rd is needed it gets played the next week.

There is a tool bar in MS paint.hildebrand wrote:wut. Why would you want to make it any longer?toxinatoR wrote:Double Elimination turns 3 weeks of playoffs into 6 weeks. Seems a tad too long considering it's a 10 week season. Invite looks like it might be down to 6 teams soon.. Imo. Best of 3 for finals.. First two matches get played on the first sunday and if a 3rd is needed it gets played the next week.
With 8 teams in every division it would be a 4 week playoff schedule. Just condense it.
OPTION #1: Make the losers bracket play more matches in some of the nights.
OPTION #2: If you lose in the 1st round then you are out for good, 2nd round creates the losers brackets?

BRO did you go to school for graphic design? That's fucking talent bro, just quit dod and focus on that.hildebrand wrote:wut. Why would you want to make it any longer?toxinatoR wrote:Double Elimination turns 3 weeks of playoffs into 6 weeks. Seems a tad too long considering it's a 10 week season. Invite looks like it might be down to 6 teams soon.. Imo. Best of 3 for finals.. First two matches get played on the first sunday and if a 3rd is needed it gets played the next week.
With 8 teams in every division it would be a 4 week playoff schedule. Just condense it.
OPTION #1: Make the losers bracket play more matches in some of the nights.
OPTION #2: If you lose in the 1st round then you are out for good, 2nd round creates the losers brackets?
hildebrand wrote:wut. Why would you want to make it any longer?toxinatoR wrote:Double Elimination turns 3 weeks of playoffs into 6 weeks. Seems a tad too long considering it's a 10 week season. Invite looks like it might be down to 6 teams soon.. Imo. Best of 3 for finals.. First two matches get played on the first sunday and if a 3rd is needed it gets played the next week.
With 8 teams in every division it would be a 4 week playoff schedule. Just condense it.
OPTION #1: Make the losers bracket play more matches in some of the nights.
OPTION #2: If you lose in the 1st round then you are out for good, 2nd round creates the losers brackets?

Playoff Format Poll
This is just a poll to see how many people would like playoffs to be double elimination. All matches would still be played on Sundays and only 1 match per night.
Would you prefer playoffs to be double elimination?
Yes
64%
No
36%

You do realize there is the potential to have 9 weeks of playoffs if each round was best of 3 and we played 1 match per week (although very slim chance but a possibility). That would just be absolutely chaotic and idiotic to do. You'd have some teams sweep while other teams have to sit around and wait for consolation matches. Not every team can play more than one match per week. Why would we inconvenience teams at the most important point of the season? Imo. Best of 3 finals and do all 3 matches in a 2 week span. First two on the first night if possible.cassinoroyale wrote:if we're doing bo3, it should be for the playoffs not only for finals or semi finals.
qtr, semi and finals with bo3 4tw!
Sunday, Apr 7th 9:00 pm EDT dod_lennon_b2 Week 1stealthlol wrote:I skipped half the responses, so I apologize if this was said, but...
To everybody saying, "this season was ten weeks long, it'd be so long with double elimination." Usually seasons have eight weeks, plus two of preseason and playoffs. That adds up to a ten week season and then playoffs...
Also, play two per weeks, blah blah blah. I like it. Thumbs up, Ben.
Well, it just don't make sense for me granting the finalists the chance of maybe throwing an upset and not granting the other finalists the same rules too. Frankly, at this point of DoD, the more matches the better. Even if it turns down to more weeks of playoffs. That means more matches after all. Then, in between the semi and finals, maybe we should be organizing Fast cups for the teams who couldn't make it to later phases. There's plenty of room for doing things outside the usual. For me, double elimination doesn't make sense as well, it really makes playoffs too long (draft formula). On regards to the bo3 idea I think most of teams would be able to play a 2nd match right after their first. Judging the schedules, the majority of teams that schedule for later times are always the upper teams, not the mid/open level teams. It's not my call anyways but I'd do a bo3 with two matches played in the same day and a 3rd match, if necessary, being played during the week (we don't have any other tournament and most of the nerds show up to scrim during the week) for quarters, semis and finals. That's my 2 cents.toxinatoR wrote:You do realize there is the potential to have 9 weeks of playoffs if each round was best of 3 and we played 1 match per week (although very slim chance but a possibility). That would just be absolutely chaotic and idiotic to do. You'd have some teams sweep while other teams have to sit around and wait for consolation matches. Not every team can play more than one match per week. Why would we inconvenience teams at the most important point of the season? Imo. Best of 3 finals and do all 3 matches in a 2 week span. First two on the first night if possible.cassinoroyale wrote:if we're doing bo3, it should be for the playoffs not only for finals or semi finals.
qtr, semi and finals with bo3 4tw!
toxinatoR wrote:Sunday, Apr 7th 9:00 pm EDT dod_lennon_b2 Week 1stealthlol wrote:I skipped half the responses, so I apologize if this was said, but...
To everybody saying, "this season was ten weeks long, it'd be so long with double elimination." Usually seasons have eight weeks, plus two of preseason and playoffs. That adds up to a ten week season and then playoffs...
Also, play two per weeks, blah blah blah. I like it. Thumbs up, Ben.
Sunday, Apr 14th 9:00 pm EDT dod_aleutian Week 2
Sunday, Apr 21st 9:00 pm EDT dod_railroad2_b2 Week 3
Sunday, Apr 28th 9:00 pm EDT dod_emmanuel Week 4
Sunday, May 5th 9:00 pm EDT dod_anzio Week 5
WEEK OFF MAY 12TH
Sunday, May 19th 9:00 pm EDT dod_halle_b2 Week 6
WEEK OFF MAY 26TH
Sunday, Jun 2nd 9:00 pm EDT dod_harrington Week 7
Sunday, Jun 9th 9:00 pm EDT dod_donner Week 8
Sunday, Jun 16th 9:00 pm EDT dod_solitude_b2 Week 9
Sunday, Jun 23rd 9:00 pm EDT dod_chemille Week 10
Sunday, Jun 30th 9:00 pm EDT dod_harrington Quarters
WEEK OFF JULY 7TH
Sunday, Jul 14th 9:00 pm EDT dod_lennon_b2 Semis
Sunday, Jul 21st 9:00 pm EDT dod_railroad2_b2 Finals
13 week season with 3 off weeks. That's a long season. 2013 We pretty much know what teams will be in the final 4. Why postpone it?




cassinoroyale wrote: Well, it just don't make sense for me granting the finalists the chance of maybe throwing an upset and not granting the other finalists the same rules too.
The season is already 16 weeks long I don't see the point of prolonging it having people sit out and watch 6 weeks of playoffs that they're not involved in. And we all know how "mini cups" and "mini drafts" work.cassinoroyale wrote: Frankly, at this point of DoD, the more matches the better. Even if it turns down to more weeks of playoffs. That means more matches after all. Then, in between the semi and finals, maybe we should be organizing Fast cups for the teams who couldn't make it to later phases. There's plenty of room for doing things outside the usual. For me, double elimination doesn't make sense as well, it really makes playoffs too long (draft formula).
toxinatoR wrote: You have the two best teams in each division playing that is the difference. If anything it gives you the chance of NOT having an upset. Like corey said a fluke ninja cap, a teams bad map, or 3 garand wiffs on a guy at trip box on harrington. You have two other maps to prove yourself.

This.k4b00m wrote:that shit drags on forever, to the point where people forget dod even exists. It prolongs the season so much that the teams that are out get bored and quit dod.
It works in the NFL because there are only so many games a football player can endure. If the Superbowl was best of 3, I probably wouldn't have seen my Giants win two superbowls in the last 6 years.Quikey wrote: This.
Plus, we all know (long) before the season ends who the best team is in each division. Isn't the fun of a 1 game playoff the fact that any team could potentially beat any other team? If we did a bo3 the better team will win damn near every time. That seems to diminish the importance of the match imo. If it works for the NFL, why shouldn't it work for us?
toxinatoR wrote:
It works in the NFL because there are only so many games a football player can endure. If the Superbowl was best of 3, I probably wouldn't have seen my Giants win two superbowls in the last 6 years.

Not to mention the much smaller skill gap...toxinatoR wrote:It works in the NFL because there are only so many games a football player can endure. If the Superbowl was best of 3, I probably wouldn't have seen my Giants win two superbowls in the last 6 years.Quikey wrote: This.
Plus, we all know (long) before the season ends who the best team is in each division. Isn't the fun of a 1 game playoff the fact that any team could potentially beat any other team? If we did a bo3 the better team will win damn near every time. That seems to diminish the importance of the match imo. If it works for the NFL, why shouldn't it work for us?
It's still exactly the same as every other season. Two weeks preseason, eight regular, and random weeks off for holidays or sports or something else = 13 week season. In other words, this season is identical to the last except teams will go into the playoffs with ten matches in their score instead of eight.toxinatoR wrote:13 week season with 3 off weeks. That's a long season. 2013 We pretty much know what teams will be in the final 4. Why postpone it?stealthlol wrote:I skipped half the responses, so I apologize if this was said, but...
To everybody saying, "this season was ten weeks long, it'd be so long with double elimination." Usually seasons have eight weeks, plus two of preseason and playoffs. That adds up to a ten week season and then playoffs...
Also, play two per weeks, blah blah blah. I like it. Thumbs up, Ben.

obv you never went to a socal lan. mwooooosh!moosh wrote:tenks wrote:dbl elimination should only be reserved for SoCAL LANS in small lan centers' with uneven rows and setups, with only 10 hours to play a complete tournament and 37 minutes to play each 40 minute matche, duh! Geez. haven't we learned anything?

tenks wrote:dbl elimination should only be reserved for SoCAL LANS in small lan centers' with uneven rows and setups, with only 10 hours to play a complete tournament and 37 minutes to play each 40 minute matche, duh! Geez. haven't we learned anything?