Dear Penn State,

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Dear Penn State,

Re: Dear Penn State,

by unpro » Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:34 pm

Semper FI wrote:
mare wrote:Nice. If only we could some how start imposing the same sort of reparations on the Catholic Church.
Lol Mare lets stay on subject, and I see as far as reputation goes the school thrives on it for there football program. Im gonna correct on the proper fucked part. They did not just get fucked over financially, but loosing there reputation along with sports team the school thrives on. I rather think that as a proper clusterfuck, not just proper fuck.

this is nineteeneleven.org, topics exist to be ignored 3 posts in.

Re: Dear Penn State,

by Semper FI » Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:14 pm

mare wrote:Nice. If only we could some how start imposing the same sort of reparations on the Catholic Church.
Lol Mare lets stay on subject, and I see as far as reputation goes the school thrives on it for there football program. Im gonna correct on the proper fucked part. They did not just get fucked over financially, but loosing there reputation along with sports team the school thrives on. I rather think that as a proper clusterfuck, not just proper fuck.

Re: Dear Penn State,

by tenks » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:40 pm

At first I didn't think so but this is much, MUCH more worse than the death penalty.

Any current stars on the program can get up and leave. It's going to be incredibly hard for recruiters to convince kids to come play ball at Penn. St. when the current players/stars are leaving...(in addition to all the other reasons mentioned, like having 0 to offer.) Although I do think the former players and alumni got reallllly screwed with the whole vacated wins thing. A lot of collateral damage from one man's actions..Such a shame.

they got proper fucked.

Image

Re: Dear Penn State,

by showtime » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:25 pm

alex kirk wrote:
showtime wrote:Image

You are missing the point. The 60 million fine goes towards a trust to assist victims of child abuse. It won't hurt the program much because it will get paid for by alumni donations. The hard part is the loss of scholarships and the post season ban. Like Alex said, this is basically equivalent to or worse than the death penalty. How do you think the coaches will recruit high school players when they have NOTHING to offer? This isn't like the USC sanctions where at least the incoming classes could play for the Rose Bowl or Natty as Jr/Sr. Don't be naive.....
Wouldn't surprise me if alumni donations dropped dramatically. After all, most of the alumni who are donating are probably parents by now.
I'm sure the donations will be diminished in the coming years. ESPN reported that the 60 million couldn't come from other sport's or department budgets which is why I assumed the bulk would come from donations. I guess it could be raised via tuition increases or fees but I think that would be a PR nightmare for the university.

Edit: And PSU plans to pay it in $12 million increments over 5 years

Re: Dear Penn State,

by sevEN » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:24 pm

CraftyDus wrote:Sandusky really fucked over these kids...

Image
i am a very big south park fan and that is one of the funniest gifs ive seen in ages lmfao

Re: Dear Penn State,

by mare » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:20 pm

Nice. If only we could some how start imposing the same sort of reparations on the Catholic Church.

Re: Dear Penn State,

by kirk » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:05 pm

showtime wrote:Image

You are missing the point. The 60 million fine goes towards a trust to assist victims of child abuse. It won't hurt the program much because it will get paid for by alumni donations. The hard part is the loss of scholarships and the post season ban. Like Alex said, this is basically equivalent to or worse than the death penalty. How do you think the coaches will recruit high school players when they have NOTHING to offer? This isn't like the USC sanctions where at least the incoming classes could play for the Rose Bowl or Natty as Jr/Sr. Don't be naive.....
Wouldn't surprise me if alumni donations dropped dramatically. After all, most of the alumni who are donating are probably parents by now.

Re: Dear Penn State,

by Jb_ » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:52 pm

The Ncaa pulled a sandusky on Penn state and fucked them in the ass. This is worse then the death penalty by far.

Re: Dear Penn State,

by lowcarb » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:44 pm

Re: Dear Penn State,

by showtime » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:31 pm

Semper FI wrote:If anything I think the NCAA commission is a bunch of feel bads for penn state, so instead of giving the death penalty they decide 60 mil in fines is good (they can gain that back within 3-4 years easily through tuition and tax breaks and returns), and that by not allowing pro balls that it might be better for as a wake up call? NCAA commission has no logic, death penalty should of been the final result.
Image

You are missing the point. The 60 million fine goes towards a trust to assist victims of child abuse. It won't hurt the program much because it will get paid for by alumni donations. The hard part is the loss of scholarships and the post season ban. Like Alex said, this is basically equivalent to or worse than the death penalty. How do you think the coaches will recruit high school players when they have NOTHING to offer? This isn't like the USC sanctions where at least the incoming classes could play for the Rose Bowl or Natty as Jr/Sr. Don't be naive.....

Re: Dear Penn State,

by CraftyDus » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:22 pm

Sandusky really fucked over these kids...

Image

Re: Dear Penn State,

by Semper FI » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:16 pm

alex kirk wrote:
Semper FI wrote:If anything I think the NCAA commission is a bunch of feel bads for penn state, so instead of giving the death penalty they decide 60 mil in fines is good (they can gain that back within 3-4 years easily through tuition and tax breaks and returns), and that by not allowing pro balls that it might be better for as a wake up call? NCAA commission has no logic, death penalty should of been the final result.
How is the death penalty worse than this?
kirk, I was mearly pointing out that the death penalty should of been invoked instead of just the fines along with no pro balls. It seems to me like the NCAA could of, should of, but didnt instead chose a route that was more like a slap to the face to penn state istead of a gun to the face by the NCAA.

Re: Dear Penn State,

by kirk » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:48 pm

Semper FI wrote:If anything I think the NCAA commission is a bunch of feel bads for penn state, so instead of giving the death penalty they decide 60 mil in fines is good (they can gain that back within 3-4 years easily through tuition and tax breaks and returns), and that by not allowing pro balls that it might be better for as a wake up call? NCAA commission has no logic, death penalty should of been the final result.
How is the death penalty worse than this?

Re: Dear Penn State,

by Semper FI » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:38 pm

If anything I think the NCAA commission is a bunch of feel bads for penn state, so instead of giving the death penalty they decide 60 mil in fines is good (they can gain that back within 3-4 years easily through tuition and tax breaks and returns), and that by not allowing pro balls that it might be better for as a wake up call? NCAA commission has no logic, death penalty should of been the final result.

Re: Dear Penn State,

by kirk » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:31 pm

SKiNnTo wrote:Thanks for the news Mr. Alex Kirk. Didn't hear the penalties yet today. Easier to read a few lines rather than watch ESPiN for an hour. Would the death penalty been easier for PSU?
Pretty sure that's the consensus. The death penalty certainly sounds much easier.

Re: Dear Penn State,

by SKiNnTo » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:23 pm

Thanks for the news Mr. Alex Kirk. Didn't hear the penalties yet today. Easier to read a few lines rather than watch ESPiN for an hour. Would the death penalty been easier for PSU?

Re: Dear Penn State,

by wintehs » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:13 pm

They're also losing the revenue sharing of the Big10 for the seasons they're banned from bowl games... so another $13mil or so

Re: Dear Penn State,

by showtime » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:04 pm

Jakimo wrote:wasnt it 600 million?
No, it was 60 million. That's basically what the football program makes in a year

Re: Dear Penn State,

by Jakimo » Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:46 pm

wasnt it 600 million?

Re: Dear Penn State,

by 3SidedQuarter » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:21 pm

Image

Re: Dear Penn State,

by Polak » Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:31 am

Image

Re: Dear Penn State,

by Miller` » Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:02 am

Wins, fine = nothing long-term.

Scholarships, no bowl?

Image

Re: Dear Penn State,

by Sears » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:51 am

Image

Re: Dear Penn State,

by scorch- » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:27 am

I tried so hard
And got so far
But in the end
It doesn't even matter

Re: Dear Penn State,

by SpoonIsBad » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:23 am

Image

Dear Penn State,

by kirk » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:12 am

-Wins from 1998 - 2011 vacated.
-Joe Paterno dropped from the most winningest NCAA coach to the eighth most winningest.
-$60 million fine.
-No bowl games for four years.
-Scholarships cut from 25 to 15.

Image

Top