1911 Beta

by **Jstampz** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:19 am

G-Shock GA-100

Pretty slick

by **Mino** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:39 am

That's a pretty cool watch.

I have something like this one (http://www.longines.com/watches/heritag ... 795.4.78.2), I couldn't find the exact one I got on their website, but it looks almost exactly like this. The only difference is that the thing that displays the day is next to the 3 on my watch, unlike this one which is by the 6. Mine also came with a brown leather strap, but I replaced it with a different strap that I think looks better, which my grandfather gave me.

I can definitely relate to how you feel though, I got that watch myself last year, and I was happy beyond belief. Granted it didn't cost me 3, 000 dollars, but it wasn't cheap, for me at least.

When I got it, I got teased so much, too. Saying that I paid too much for a watch that an old man would buy. Screw that, this watch has exactly what I was looking for.

Congrats.

by **An1maL** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 4:30 am

fuck me, 3 grand on a watch? wouldn't a 200$ watch work/look almost as good? and isn't there a TINY percentage of people that will actually be able to tell the difference?

don't mean to flame you, of course, I've always felt that way about e.g people spending 200£ on a t-shirt in harrods or something. i'm just curious about what proportion of the price of that watch is justified in terms of functionality vs it being a fashion or status symbol ?

by **Fleener** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:17 am

I only wear watches when I dress nice for work, events, weddings, etc. I really like watches, but don't really have the money to go crazy on price. Plus you can find decent looking watches for around $100 on sale.

I currently wear the Pulsar PF8331 which i got on sale for $40

I also have an Invicta 2876 which I paid $60 for back in 06

by **jmny** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:25 pm

This is my watch:

http://www.amazon.com/Casio-AMW330B-1A- ... sio+amw330

Clearly not for style, but the second hand works just fine for checking pulse and respiration rates!

And no, I would have to say that I'm not into watches. Nice purchase, though, looks legit as hell.

by **Polak** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:18 pm

Quikey wrote:
Polak wrote:
But whatever I don't need to explain to your broke ass.
Correct, but thank you for doing so, and I guess proving my point?

You really don't know me.

by **ward** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:12 pm

Quikey wrote:
ward wrote:Someone's fucking jealous. Can I afford these watches? No, not really. But you also don't see me crying. The guy likes watches that are actually crafted well. Deal with it.

Am I jealous I don't have 3,500.00 to spend on a watch? Of course I am. Did I cry? I don't think so, but emotions often get misread on the internet. Neither were the point of my original post(s).

"I don't know you, but this looks like a "look how much I make and can afford to spend on a watch" post."

by **Quikey** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:11 pm

ward wrote:Someone's fucking jealous. Can I afford these watches? No, not really. But you also don't see me crying. The guy likes watches that are actually crafted well. Deal with it.

Am I jealous I don't have 3,500.00 to spend on a watch? Of course I am. Did I cry? I don't think so, but emotions often get misread on the internet. Neither were the point of my original post(s).

by **ward** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:56 pm

Someone's fucking jealous. Can I afford these watches? No, not really. But you also don't see me crying. The guy likes watches that are actually crafted well. Deal with it.

by **Quikey** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:48 pm

Polak wrote:
But whatever I don't need to explain to your broke ass.

Correct, but thank you for doing so, and I guess proving my point?

by **Polak** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:44 pm

Quikey wrote:I don't know you, but this looks like a "look how much I make and can afford to spend on a watch" post. I only say that because you linked to a site with the price, instead of just the picture. Yes, I'm aware I'm about to get negged to all hell, but o'well. The watch looks nice though.

This is true, but it's a site that makes and has all the information on the watch. Maybe I should of taken the time to take a whole bunch of pictures with different angles and then explained the whole thing in writing? Either way you can find out the price of the watch by just posting pictures of it.

But whatever I don't need to explain to your broke ass.

by **Quikey** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:30 pm

I don't know you, but this looks like a "look how much I make and can afford to spend on a watch" post. I only say that because you linked to a site with the price, instead of just the picture. Yes, I'm aware I'm about to get negged to all hell, but o'well. The watch looks nice though.

by **ward** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:48 pm

Polak wrote:
Gorillabc wrote:I read this as "Look at me, I spent $3,200 on a watch. Please validate my expenditure!"
I remember you writing a lot about heroin and how you like to do it and other various drugs. Which I respect because you are allowed to do anything as you want with your money. You can read this thread as you like as well. I wouldn't be surprised if you've spent more money on drugs over the years.

by **Polak** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:50 am

Hudson` wrote:I have tiny wrists, watches tend to look awful on me.

Can you like take a few pics with objects to see how skinny your wrists are? Like is it "I survived auschwitz" skinny? (Too Soon?)

by **Polak** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:49 am

hildebrand wrote:http://imgur.com/a/m9KCI

Made a quick album! Check it out friends!

I tried really hard to find this watch. A couple mins of search and going through the catalogs and I couldn't find anything similar. There are replicas that have the moon and sun theme for 150 to 300 bucks. Even though it's a "fake" it might still have some value, but above all else, it has personal value!

And thank you for the complement on my band!

by **Polak** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:42 am

ward wrote:I tend to buy watches that won't conduct electricity / get destroyed while working. I have a Fossil laying around but I don't usually wear it. I had a Timex watch that (while cheap) lasted through two deployments overseas in a variety of environments.

Gshock makes great watches and I believe are sponsors for the military or something? I'm not sure on that one.

by **Polak** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:41 am

Pr0n wrote:if i ever got 20k € liying in some dark corner this would be the pice to wear for me.

http://www.glashuette-original.com/coll ... ounter-xl/

but this could take some time :p

So just people understand why this watch costs 20,000 dollars and for one to appreciate the engineering behind it. The fly back and the counter increases the value of the watch tenfold because it's adding more complexity to such a confound space. Pretty cool fucking shit

video to watch!

6BnmBR-xBxo

by **Polak** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:28 am

scorch- wrote:Just curious, how much of that cost is the timepiece? Like, can you buy a separate strap for it if you don't like the brown leather?

Yes you can, there are various straps you can get.

Leather straps are more dressy and classy than bracelets, and as mentioned above, are a requirement for dress watches, and that alone has ensured their popularity. Many casual watches look good on leather as well, though. Leather straps vary in price a great deal, with some top-end brands and styles costing hundreds of dollars. Also I got a

Dropping the leather strap and just trying to order the time piece (which you can only do online after it is used I believe) can have cost drop significantly. I think you could get the time piece alone around 1800-2000 bucks if it's near mint condition.

I couldn't find a site online where you can order just the timepiece of the watch. Check with a jeweler

by **Polak** » Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:21 am

Gorillabc wrote:I read this as "Look at me, I spent $3,200 on a watch. Please validate my expenditure!"

I remember you writing a lot about heroin and how you like to do it and other various drugs. Which I respect because you are allowed to do anything as you want with your money. You can read this thread as you like as well. I wouldn't be surprised if you've spent more money on drugs over the years.

by **Hudson`** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:13 pm

I have tiny wrists, watches tend to look awful on me.

by **hildebrand** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:28 pm

Really like the band on your Polak. Distinguished as fck.

by **hildebrand** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:17 pm

http://imgur.com/a/m9KCI

Made a quick album! Check it out friends!

by **Arachnid** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:41 pm

lol, watches aren't just about telling time. That's just an added bonus while looking classy as fuck.

by **insom** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:24 pm

http://www.nywatchstore.com/prg130y1.html

Love this watch. It does everything I need.

by **nik** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:17 pm

I can't live without them. Always had a watch. So now I can't get used to reading time on a cellphone (I tried).

Got 3. Nothing fancy. I have no money to spend on these (or anything else really)
I pay the $100+ (< $200) price to get a watch that does not break. My oldest I've had for 12 years now.

by **knockout** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:15 pm

nah I have a cell phone

by **ward** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:03 pm

I tend to buy watches that won't conduct electricity / get destroyed while working. I have a Fossil laying around but I don't usually wear it. I had a Timex watch that (while cheap) lasted through two deployments overseas in a variety of environments.

by **Pr0n** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 1:03 pm

if i ever got 20k € liying in some dark corner this would be the pice to wear for me.

http://www.glashuette-original.com/coll ... ounter-xl/

but this could take some time :p

by **scorch-** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 pm

Just curious, how much of that cost is the timepiece? Like, can you buy a separate strap for it if you don't like the brown leather?

by **Gorillabc** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:44 am

I read this as "Look at me, I spent $3,200 on a watch. Please validate my expenditure!"

by **D-bo** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:50 am

I never said it had great movement, components, etc. In my personal experience I have 3 fossil watches and they are reliable. I'm still young and don't have money to buy an amazing watch that you older folk wear with a simple look, dont get me wrong I love a simple watch with a single dial but some niggas cant pull off the look. And honestly I live in La and have only seen a handful of people that actually wear fossil watches so I'm not sure how it can be considered trendy or "fashiony??". That list is outdated, the only watches people wear now are Michael Kors and G-shocks. I may have spent more money than its worth but I trust the brand. I buy a watch based on how it looks and how long it will tick until it blows up, when I get rich and famous from my Dod career I will look into watches based on mechanics over $500.

by **Polak** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:04 am

D-bo wrote:I love fossil collections good pricing and pretty reliable anything above $100 will last years currently rocking this

http://www.fossil.com/en_US/shop/men/ca ... ath=ME1131

Now I'm not making fun of you, this is simply an observation and I find it funny because I was reading about fossil and that watch specifically.

Fossil, Gucci, etc are watches that make "Fashion watches" and I'm quoting an article that actually hyper links your fossil watch, the Grant Twist Stainless Steel Watch.

"Fashion watches are designed by companies purely for their aesthetics, with no regard for the movement or other things watch enthusiasts tend to look for in watches. They generally use quartz movements, and the few who do use mechanical movements almost always just use unmodified ebauche movements, and have no interest in embellishing them or trying to develop their own. Oftentimes the company has other product lines as well, such as jewelry or sunglasses. Especially with the higher-end companies, the watches they sell are massively overpriced, considering the quality (or lack thereof) of the components and craftsmanship that have gone into them. Naturally, this is the complete opposite of what most watch enthusiasts are looking for in a timepiece, and as such they will have little to no interest in a fashion watch, regardless of how it looks. Examples of fashion watch companies are Fossil, Gucci, and Hermes (though Hermes does offer some high-end pieces with unique complications and other worthwhile features)."

What makes me laugh is that this is your watch and you have a rep of -129905 with the title "Full Retard"

So maybe it's perfect?

by **D-bo** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:45 am

I love fossil collections good pricing and pretty reliable anything above $100 will last years currently rocking this

http://www.fossil.com/en_US/shop/men/ca ... ath=ME1131

by **lolinus** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:45 am

Polak wrote:
lolinus wrote:
Polak wrote:
Something very interesting your watch is that it's a sports watch. That section surrounding the crystal (glass) of the watch spins around and is supposed to be used to keep track of time for laps or whatever sport related. Typically this watches are thicker and should "not" (up to you what to wear) be worn with a suit. And appropriate watch for suits are "thin" watches.

Check out this link for example on what I'm talking about
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch& ... 4APD-IHwDA
Didn't even know lolz. I'm not really into watches, the watch got more of a sentimental value to me, more than a "fashion" item.

That's what they should be! Who cares what other people think.

I remember i used to have a watch with leather straps or something, but it was kinda itchy for me, you don't have that "problem" with them?

by **cassinoroyale** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:41 am

Polak wrote:
cassinoroyale wrote:I always wanted to know why bother on spending small fortunes on watches as if we don't have cellphones... I understand people using it for nostalgia sake but I'd never buy a tissot or swatch. It's not about price but rather the point on using a watch as big as a man's wrist.
There are many ways people choose to express themselves. Clothes, tattoos, etc. Everyone's different and I find myself captivated towards watches and I really can't explain to you why. Maybe because I'm color blind and I SUCK at dressing myself. Maybe Kirk will know the physiology effects... But wearing this thing has kept a smile on my face.

And... you don't have to dig into your pockets to check the time from your cellphone.

Well, you got my attention brah coz I believe we always need to do what make us happy. If you're truly happy using these kind of watches, then who am I to even consider questioning? I'm not saying this with sarcasm or anything related but reading your reply made me have a little epiphany on what is important for us to be happy. While I don't think they don't fit needs I do understand that what's good for me might not work necessarily for you and so on. And not having to get the cellphone out from the pocket is another good reason indeed. Anyway, I'm happy for your first watch bought, congrats!

by **Polak** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:40 am

lolinus wrote:
Polak wrote:
lolinus wrote:

Casio stainless steel, don't know if it's any particular model or anything, but it do look good when I'm wearing a suit.

Something very interesting your watch is that it's a sports watch. That section surrounding the crystal (glass) of the watch spins around and is supposed to be used to keep track of time for laps or whatever sport related. Typically this watches are thicker and should "not" (up to you what to wear) be worn with a suit. And appropriate watch for suits are "thin" watches.

Check out this link for example on what I'm talking about
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch& ... 4APD-IHwDA
Didn't even know lolz. I'm not really into watches, the watch got more of a sentimental value to me, more than a "fashion" item.

That's what they should be! Who cares what other people think.

by **lolinus** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:38 am

Polak wrote:
lolinus wrote:

Casio stainless steel, don't know if it's any particular model or anything, but it do look good when I'm wearing a suit.

Something very interesting your watch is that it's a sports watch. That section surrounding the crystal (glass) of the watch spins around and is supposed to be used to keep track of time for laps or whatever sport related. Typically this watches are thicker and should "not" (up to you what to wear) be worn with a suit. And appropriate watch for suits are "thin" watches.

Check out this link for example on what I'm talking about
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch& ... 4APD-IHwDA

Didn't even know lolz. I'm not really into watches, the watch got more of a sentimental value to me, more than a "fashion" item. Same as i wear a golden chain(a very thin chain), sentimental.

Also, i don't like "thin" watches, as i bought one before, i like the "thicker". I kinda like to feel the weight on the wrist.

by **Polak** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:35 am

wintehs wrote:I love watches as long as they're done right. I for one don't like some of the gaudy ass one's I see people wear, but Polak you definitely made a good choice with the one you bought.

I would eventually get to "gaudy ass" watches in the future when I make more money and I would def buy them used. Being that this was my first watch I wanted to go with more "class."

And thank you!

by **Polak** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:33 am

lolinus wrote:

Casio stainless steel, don't know if it's any particular model or anything, but it do look good when I'm wearing a suit.

Something very interesting your watch is that it's a sports watch. That section surrounding the crystal (glass) of the watch spins around and is supposed to be used to keep track of time for laps or whatever sport related. Typically this watches are thicker and should "not" (up to you what to wear) be worn with a suit. And appropriate watch for suits are "thin" watches.

Check out this link for example on what I'm talking about
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch& ... 4APD-IHwDA

by **Polak** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:27 am

cassinoroyale wrote:I always wanted to know why bother on spending small fortunes on watches as if we don't have cellphones... I understand people using it for nostalgia sake but I'd never buy a tissot or swatch. It's not about price but rather the point on using a watch as big as a man's wrist.

There are many reasons why, but it's mostly for the aesthetic. For instance you can get a ten dollar Casio watch and it will tell the same, if not better, time as a Rolex. However there is a difference of having a mechanical watch vs an electrical. There is far more craft involved in an automatic mechanical watch (self winding). Having multiple gears for various panels increases the complexity and craft. Most watches are not hand made, but the engineering behind it is remarkable to me.

There are many ways people choose to express themselves. Clothes, tattoos, etc. Everyone's different and I find myself captivated towards watches and I really can't explain to you why. Maybe because I'm color blind and I SUCK at dressing myself. Maybe Kirk will know the physiology effects... But wearing this thing has kept a smile on my face.

And... you don't have to dig into your pockets to check the time from your cellphone.

by **lolinus** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:12 am

Casio stainless steel, don't know if it's any particular model or anything, but it do look good when I'm wearing a suit.

by **cassinoroyale** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 8:59 am

I always wanted to know why bother on spending small fortunes on watches as if we don't have cellphones... I understand people using it for nostalgia sake but I'd never buy a tissot or swatch. It's not about price but rather the point on using a watch as big as a man's wrist.

by **scorch-** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 8:58 am

Don't know shit about watches but that's what I wear. Couldn't find a better photo on google.

by **wintehs** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 8:35 am

I love watches as long as they're done right. I for one don't like some of the gaudy ass one's I see people wear, but Polak you definitely made a good choice with the one you bought.

by **crawtona** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 8:30 am

I find watches annoying and uncomfortable to wear.

by **Polak** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 8:23 am

I recently made my first big boy watch purchase. I didn't do the walk when I graduated college because my close family was overseas or far away and the actual date landed on a Monday so I didn't want to have close friends take off work etc. (Ok I have no friends)

So I wanted to get something signifying my "accomplishments" and get a very simple nice looking watch.

I got the TAG Heuer Carrera Calibre 7 Twin time Automatic watch 39 mm
https://shop-us.tagheuer.com/en/calibre ... c6181.html

I went with the twin time because my first "real" job has me in Abu Dhabi so having two different times zones with out a complex dial is nice, I knew I wanted a date wheel, and a leather strap, (I went with alligator)

I could of gotten the watch 20-30 % cheaper near mint "used" but I wanted my first watch to be mine and only mine... cheesy? But who cares my choice.

So any of you nerds into watches (timepieces, if you're a prick)?

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: Any of you Nerds into watches?