ruthLess down

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: ruthLess down

Re: ruthLess down

by scorch- » Mon Aug 12, 2013 6:11 am

arnsk wrote:
scorch- wrote:
arnsk wrote:When you play high level counter-strike I can promise you there is a more broad group of players who will say learning how to strafe jump etc. is a fundamental part of understanding the movement aspect of HL1 mods. IMO crouch/duck hopping etc. is just AS important as it helps you reach objectives more efficiently without absolutely burning your stamina.
What the fuck are you talking about? Why do you need to bind +duck to mwheel to crouch hop over obstacles? Crouch hopping is not banned. Binding the command to mwheel and spamming it while running (just like spamming hand signals) is illegal because it's stupid and breaks the game.
It's not like I run around spamming it (derp), it definitely is a lot more efficient to execute a crouch hop after a sprint...
If Ray Charles can play the piano, I think you can tap your fucking control key twice like the rest of the world. Like, what prompted you to bind +duck to your mwheel in the first place? There's no reason to ever even do that unless you want to run around spamming it.

Re: ruthLess down

by joeledmunds » Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:02 pm

mare wrote:
shoguNtw wrote:
Polak wrote:Is there a real argument about this?

Don't bind crouch to mouse wheel it fucks up the hit boxes. Or to shoot a carbine. Well you should just be banned if you use a carbine.



I use mouse wheel up to jump that's about it.
yeah fucks up the hitboxes in this 25 year old game that has perfect hit boxes without crouch hopping
Yeah!!! The game is already so messed up, dead and broken (lolz), what's the harm in making myself 10 times harder to hit by fucking around with mousewheel binds?

What?

Re: ruthLess down

by mare » Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:24 pm

shoguNtw wrote:
Polak wrote:Is there a real argument about this?

Don't bind crouch to mouse wheel it fucks up the hit boxes. Or to shoot a carbine. Well you should just be banned if you use a carbine.



I use mouse wheel up to jump that's about it.
yeah fucks up the hitboxes in this 25 year old game that has perfect hit boxes without crouch hopping
Yeah!!! The game is already so messed up, dead and broken (lolz), what's the harm in making myself 10 times harder to hit by fucking around with mousewheel binds?

What?

Re: ruthLess down

by nomis » Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:56 am

oh man, we won't stance a chance without our mousewheeler :cry:

Re: ruthLess down

by shoguNtw » Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:24 pm

Polak wrote:Is there a real argument about this?

Don't bind crouch to mouse wheel it fucks up the hit boxes. Or to shoot a carbine. Well you should just be banned if you use a carbine.



I use mouse wheel up to jump that's about it.
yeah fucks up the hitboxes in this 25 year old game that has perfect hit boxes without crouch hopping

Re: ruthLess down

by Polak » Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:05 pm

Is there a real argument about this?

Don't bind crouch to mouse wheel it fucks up the hit boxes. Or to shoot a carbine. Well you should just be banned if you use a carbine.



I use mouse wheel up to jump that's about it.

Re: ruthLess down

by arnsk » Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:45 pm

scorch- wrote:
arnsk wrote:When you play high level counter-strike I can promise you there is a more broad group of players who will say learning how to strafe jump etc. is a fundamental part of understanding the movement aspect of HL1 mods. IMO crouch/duck hopping etc. is just AS important as it helps you reach objectives more efficiently without absolutely burning your stamina.
What the fuck are you talking about? Why do you need to bind +duck to mwheel to crouch hop over obstacles? Crouch hopping is not banned. Binding the command to mwheel and spamming it while running (just like spamming hand signals) is illegal because it's stupid and breaks the game.
It's not like I run around spamming it (derp), it definitely is a lot more efficient to execute a crouch hop after a sprint...

Re: ruthLess down

by toxinatoR » Sat Aug 10, 2013 2:20 pm

Hudson` wrote:WAKE UP SHEEPLE. Facist neo-conservative TPG Admins like Tin Bad (Was he even born in America? Wheres the birth certificate?) are trying to enslave us by poisoning our water and removing one +mwheel bind at a time. Soon our mouse wheels will be useless.

l9RBXlE86Ng

Image

Re: ruthLess down

by toxinatoR » Sat Aug 10, 2013 2:18 pm

Hudson` wrote:Is knockout using invisible ink or something? Are people not even reading his posts? Because I'm pretty sure he's nailed it like 5 or 6 times now.

Let's note the difference between theory and practice here. In broad stroke theory, it's completely absurd to make a rule saying that you can bind a particular command to any key you want except this one. This is some George Carlin Seven Dirty Words shit, right? People should be able to customize their settings amirite? Philosophically, I'm with you, bros.

Hmmm...but wait....I wonder what would happen if someone abused this bind? I know, sounds crazy, but lets Gedanken this shit for a moment...
knockout wrote: When a player model is constantly going between duck and standing, their hitboxes are constantly switching from duck hitboxes to standing hitboxes. There is no fluid movement for these, so you're basically playing hitbox roulette when you try to shoot a player who is doing this....... If your hitboxes are in an area where your player model isn't, that means an enemy player can shoot your model and not register a hit. I didn't think I'd really have to explain this.
Welp then. That pretty much fucking clears it up, don't it?

Also, because I can't resist
arnsk wrote:That's probably the most unreasonable ban I've seen in my opinion. I used to play a ton of kz_maps or surf_maps, having crouch bound to +mwheelup/down is a necessity. If you DON'T you are simply behind the curve.
Yeah. Totally. Let's build our rulebook for competitive DoD on what works -- in a different game -- for maps where the goal is to climb your electronic character to the top of a giant beanpole in the sky.
Image

Re: ruthLess down

by stile » Sat Aug 10, 2013 1:52 pm

Do you?

Re: ruthLess down

by mike? » Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:57 am

kirk wrote:
stile wrote:do you even write what you read before you type it
Do you even read what I post before you respond?

Hint: I didn't say that bind doesn't make a difference, but I was sarcastically alluding to the fact that it did not make an "insurmountable" difference. Goodness it was a hyperbolic statement, you should have been able to see I was being sarcastic.

DO Y'ALL EVEN LIFT?

Re: ruthLess down

by milo » Sat Aug 10, 2013 12:25 am

milo wrote:Interesting thread
Probably won't read again though

Re: ruthLess down

by milo » Sat Aug 10, 2013 12:25 am

Interesting thread

Re: ruthLess down

by shoguNtw » Sat Aug 10, 2013 12:06 am

shoguNtw wrote:shogun will now only miss 1 week in american dod
unfortunately it has to be against the toughest team in the league. I wish my boys the best of luck, and i will be there to support you.

Re: ruthLess down

by shoguNtw » Sat Aug 10, 2013 12:04 am

shogun will now only miss 1 week in american dod

Re: ruthLess down

by nunz » Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:30 pm

ward wrote:
cassinoroyale wrote:
stile wrote: Image
Image
Image
the chosen one gifs earns +reps every time.

Re: ruthLess down

by ward » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:45 pm

cassinoroyale wrote:
stile wrote:
cassinoroyale wrote:
Image
Image
Image

Re: ruthLess down

by cassinoroyale » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:34 pm

stile wrote:
cassinoroyale wrote:
motive wrote: Most people follow the rules just because they're the rules, not because they'll get caught.
Image
Image

Re: ruthLess down

by Hudson` » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:27 pm

WAKE UP SHEEPLE. Facist neo-conservative TPG Admins like Tin Bad (Was he even born in America? Wheres the birth certificate?) are trying to enslave us by poisoning our water and removing one +mwheel bind at a time. Soon our mouse wheels will be useless.

l9RBXlE86Ng

Re: ruthLess down

by stile » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:03 pm

cassinoroyale wrote:
motive wrote:
shoguNtw wrote:fucks the point of the rule if you there was no way to find out someone was using the bind.
Most people follow the rules just because they're the rules, not because they'll get caught.
Image

Re: ruthLess down

by ao_ » Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:05 am

Biogenesis case meets TPG. Who is the next DoD player to fall from PED's?? I have always known Kobe was on something illegal and it is up to the league to clean up these players who try to have an unfair advantage over everyone else. We just want to play the game man.

Re: ruthLess down

by avenger » Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:18 am

mike? wrote:Y'ALL THINK THIS IS A FUCKING GAME?
Image

Re: ruthLess down

by mike? » Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:46 am

Y'ALL THINK THIS IS A FUCKING GAME?

Re: ruthLess down

by cassinoroyale » Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:11 am

motive wrote:
shoguNtw wrote:fucks the point of the rule if you there was no way to find out someone was using the bind.
Most people follow the rules just because they're the rules, not because they'll get caught.

Re: ruthLess down

by motive » Fri Aug 09, 2013 7:54 am

shoguNtw wrote:fucks the point of the rule if you there was no way to find out someone was using the bind.
Most people follow the rules just because they're the rules, not because they'll get caught.

Re: ruthLess down

by Yaso » Fri Aug 09, 2013 7:36 am

shoguNtw wrote: there is no way to prove it does anything to hit boxes. i was told there was nothing admins could do to detect the bind until now but yet it has been illegal for how long? fucks the point of the rule if you there was no way to find out someone was using the bind. it has been illegal for a long time now and this is the first suspension ive seen from it...lol
Handle: SnoopS
Team: Veni Vidi Vici
Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:67157511
Start Date: Aug 05 2013
End Date: Aug 26 2013
Rule Violation: 7.4
Reason: Use of an Illegal Bind in a TPG Match


You may have been the first shotgun, but probably won't be the last.

Re: ruthLess down

by shoguNtw » Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:14 pm

stile wrote:Based off first hand experience, using the mousewheel to crouch hop doesn't make a huge difference in hit registry. I've used it since dpk and still manage to go negative. I would have kept it bound if kaboom hadn't told me before the match it was illegal. Unbinding it was probably the main reason why I did so shitty that match. I'd prefer it wasn't illegal as I don't think it makes as big a difference as some people appear to claim and I wouldn't be so shitty.

Other cvar's like lightgamma I understand, but to my knowledge DoD was patched and lightgamma can't be changed anymore. I used to play with lightgamma back in the day also and figured everyone else did as well so it wasn't a huge deal. Come to think of it I also changed my m_pitch haha.

I like your style sloth. Keep doing what you're doing.
there is no way to prove it does anything to hit boxes. i was told there was nothing admins could do to detect the bind until now but yet it has been illegal for how long? fucks the point of the rule if you there was no way to find out someone was using the bind. it has been illegal for a long time now and this is the first suspension ive seen from it...lol

Re: ruthLess down

by mogers » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:52 pm

stile wrote:Unbinding it was probably the main reason why I did so shitty that match.
Image

Re: ruthLess down

by stile » Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:38 pm

Based off first hand experience, using the mousewheel to crouch hop doesn't make a huge difference in hit registry. I've used it since dpk and still manage to go negative. I would have kept it bound if kaboom hadn't told me before the match it was illegal. Unbinding it was probably the main reason why I did so shitty that match. I'd prefer it wasn't illegal as I don't think it makes as big a difference as some people appear to claim and I wouldn't be so shitty.

Other cvar's like lightgamma I understand, but to my knowledge DoD was patched and lightgamma can't be changed anymore. I used to play with lightgamma back in the day also and figured everyone else did as well so it wasn't a huge deal. Come to think of it I also changed my m_pitch haha.

I like your style sloth. Keep doing what you're doing.

Re: ruthLess down

by mike » Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:00 pm

arnsk wrote:That's probably the most unreasonable ban I've seen in my opinion. I used to play a ton of kz_maps or surf_maps, having crouch bound to +mwheelup/down is a necessity. If you DON'T you are simply behind the curve. When you play high level counter-strike I can promise you there is a more broad group of players who will say learning how to strafe jump etc. is a fundamental part of understanding the movement aspect of HL1 mods. IMO crouch/duck hopping etc. is just AS important as it helps you reach objectives more efficiently without absolutely burning your stamina.

That kind of mind set fits well strategically in a video game like this. I don't think it effects the game negatively. I don't see it being a problem. If that's the case ban crouch-hop-shots because I have been using mwheel for +duck for years.
Doing something for years doesn't make it right.

Re: ruthLess down

by Jb_ » Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:20 pm

You can join my team bros.

Re: ruthLess down

by akiro » Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:49 pm

No, come back in two weeks.

Re: ruthLess down

by shoguNtw » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:54 pm

arnsk wrote:That's probably the most unreasonable ban I've seen in my opinion. I used to play a ton of kz_maps or surf_maps, having crouch bound to +mwheelup/down is a necessity. If you DON'T you are simply behind the curve. When you play high level counter-strike I can promise you there is a more broad group of players who will say learning how to strafe jump etc. is a fundamental part of understanding the movement aspect of HL1 mods. IMO crouch/duck hopping etc. is just AS important as it helps you reach objectives more efficiently without absolutely burning your stamina.

That kind of mind set fits well strategically in a video game like this. I don't think it effects the game negatively. I don't see it being a problem. If that's the case ban crouch-hop-shots because I have been using mwheel for +duck for years.

Re: ruthLess down

by Hudson` » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:09 pm

Is knockout using invisible ink or something? Are people not even reading his posts? Because I'm pretty sure he's nailed it like 5 or 6 times now.

Let's note the difference between theory and practice here. In broad stroke theory, it's completely absurd to make a rule saying that you can bind a particular command to any key you want except this one. This is some George Carlin Seven Dirty Words shit, right? People should be able to customize their settings amirite? Philosophically, I'm with you, bros.

Hmmm...but wait....I wonder what would happen if someone abused this bind? I know, sounds crazy, but lets Gedanken this shit for a moment...
knockout wrote: When a player model is constantly going between duck and standing, their hitboxes are constantly switching from duck hitboxes to standing hitboxes. There is no fluid movement for these, so you're basically playing hitbox roulette when you try to shoot a player who is doing this....... If your hitboxes are in an area where your player model isn't, that means an enemy player can shoot your model and not register a hit. I didn't think I'd really have to explain this.
Welp then. That pretty much fucking clears it up, don't it?

Also, because I can't resist
arnsk wrote:That's probably the most unreasonable ban I've seen in my opinion. I used to play a ton of kz_maps or surf_maps, having crouch bound to +mwheelup/down is a necessity. If you DON'T you are simply behind the curve.
Yeah. Totally. Let's build our rulebook for competitive DoD on what works -- in a different game -- for maps where the goal is to climb your electronic character to the top of a giant beanpole in the sky.

Re: ruthLess down

by knockout » Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:27 pm

arnsk wrote:That's probably the most unreasonable ban I've seen in my opinion. I used to play a ton of kz_maps or surf_maps, having crouch bound to +mwheelup/down is a necessity. If you DON'T you are simply behind the curve. When you play high level counter-strike I can promise you there is a more broad group of players who will say learning how to strafe jump etc. is a fundamental part of understanding the movement aspect of HL1 mods. IMO crouch/duck hopping etc. is just AS important as it helps you reach objectives more efficiently without absolutely burning your stamina.

That kind of mind set fits well strategically in a video game like this. I don't think it effects the game negatively. I don't see it being a problem. If that's the case ban crouch-hop-shots because I have been using mwheel for +duck for years.
Hey arn, former high level counter-strike player here. If you would ask anyone in the top leagues of cs, they would tell you "lol it's illegal to bind mousewheel to duck." Strafe jumping and overall movement aspects, as you put it, does not include binding duck to mousewheel. It's illegal. It's against the rules. It's giving a player an unfair advantage and screwing with the way the game is played. It is a suspendable offense. It is never allowed in competitive play.

Re: ruthLess down

by knockout » Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:24 pm

I guess I see binding one action to a key via the built in GUI in order to better utilize a built in feature of the game as being much different than loading/writing a full on script in your config in order to eliminate a built in function of the game, yes.
Seriously? The built in feature of the game is to crouch. Not to hop around and ruin the physics of the game. You can enhance recoil control with one simple command. You don't need to write/load a script.
I also don't see how using it in the manner that would supposedly "screw up" your hit boxes would ever be an actual beneficial thing to do.
Again, seriously? If your hitboxes are in an area where your player model isn't, that means an enemy player can shoot your model and not register a hit. I didn't think I'd really have to explain this.

Re: ruthLess down

by scorch- » Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:08 pm

arnsk wrote:When you play high level counter-strike I can promise you there is a more broad group of players who will say learning how to strafe jump etc. is a fundamental part of understanding the movement aspect of HL1 mods. IMO crouch/duck hopping etc. is just AS important as it helps you reach objectives more efficiently without absolutely burning your stamina.
What the fuck are you talking about? Why do you need to bind +duck to mwheel to crouch hop over obstacles? Crouch hopping is not banned. Binding the command to mwheel and spamming it while running (just like spamming hand signals) is illegal because it's stupid and breaks the game.

Re: ruthLess down

by avenger » Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:17 pm

nm i should've read arns post xD ignore my idiocy.

Re: ruthLess down

by Jakimo » Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:43 pm

let us keep something!
please dont ban crouch hop shots. just please.

Re: ruthLess down

by arnsk » Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:38 pm

Also want to add that people seem to shoot me fine, I still get shot in the face for making OGL plays.

Re: ruthLess down

by arnsk » Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:36 pm

That's probably the most unreasonable ban I've seen in my opinion. I used to play a ton of kz_maps or surf_maps, having crouch bound to +mwheelup/down is a necessity. If you DON'T you are simply behind the curve. When you play high level counter-strike I can promise you there is a more broad group of players who will say learning how to strafe jump etc. is a fundamental part of understanding the movement aspect of HL1 mods. IMO crouch/duck hopping etc. is just AS important as it helps you reach objectives more efficiently without absolutely burning your stamina.

That kind of mind set fits well strategically in a video game like this. I don't think it effects the game negatively. I don't see it being a problem. If that's the case ban crouch-hop-shots because I have been using mwheel for +duck for years.

Re: ruthLess down

by cassinoroyale » Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:29 pm

sloth wrote:i'm sorry ruthLess, but your behavior simply begs to be made fun of
Spoiler: show
it's all in good fun though :D

Image

got pissed for not reading "Watch your language" in your spoiler.

Re: ruthLess down

by sloth » Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:30 pm

shoguNtw wrote:
sloth wrote:from this:
shoguNtw wrote: It's time to hang it up for a while, as much as I didn't like the suspension it's not the biggest reason I left. Working a lot nowadays and the time away from work I need to be spending with my son and little family I have, I'll be turning the team over to Austin/ Bewton for the remainder of this season

I'm sorry dod isn't the #1 priority in my life
to this:
shoguNtw wrote:I've changed my mind already because my serious suspension was shortened to 2 weeks and because I believe we can win this season. Even though apparently some admins wanted me banned longer for my harmless bind. Let the rustling begin
http://nineteeneleven.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2610

youre making your way up the troll ladder quite fast arent ya
i'm sorry ruthLess, but your behavior simply begs to be made fun of
Spoiler: show
it's all in good fun though :D

Re: ruthLess down

by shoguNtw » Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:21 pm

sloth wrote:from this:
shoguNtw wrote:
mike wrote:Still don't understand why he left iwa roster. It's only a 3 week suspension.. it's not the end of the world lol..
It's time to hang it up for a while, as much as I didn't like the suspension it's not the biggest reason I left. Working a lot nowadays and the time away from work I need to be spending with my son and little family I have, I'll be turning the team over to Austin/ Bewton for the remainder of this season
bullgooselooney wrote: It could have been a lot worse. Ditch your team cause of 3 matches is sad. I bet people also think jump scripts are legal :lol:.

I'm sorry dod isn't the #1 priority in my life
to this:
shoguNtw wrote:I've changed my mind already because my serious suspension was shortened to 2 weeks and because I believe we can win this season. Even though apparently some admins wanted me banned longer for my harmless bind. Let the rustling begin
http://nineteeneleven.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2610

youre making your way up the troll ladder quite fast arent ya

Re: ruthLess down

by crawtona » Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:18 pm

knockout wrote:
Just because it's illegal, doesn't mean it should be. Plus, I was being sarcastic to make a point. The point being, you are banning a mechanic of the game based on your belief that said mechanic should require a higher amount of difficulty to achieve or gives some unfair advantage (even though everybody is just as capable of using it). Just like pubs want you to mash your number keys instead of the quickswitch button.
I know you were being sarcastic. I was just pointing out how weak your point was.

First off, this was banned years ago when it was discovered. And guess what? There was no outrage against it, because it is obvious how it ruins the game. When a player model is constantly going between duck and standing, their hitboxes are constantly switching from duck hitboxes to standing hitboxes. There is no fluid movement for these, so you're basically playing hitbox roulette when you try to shoot a player who is doing this. This is why this bind has been, is, and will remain illegal.

Secondly, it absolutely should require a higher amount of difficulty to achieve this. This is breaking the fundamentals of a FPS game, and making yourself very hard to hit should not be as easy as tweaking a bind. Doesn't that seem a little bit like making your recoil easier to control by tweaking a command? Just because everyone is capable of doing it doesn't mean it should be done. Everyone is capable of aimbotting, but I don't think it's a good idea to allow that.
I guess I see binding one action to a key via the built in GUI in order to better utilize a built in feature of the game as being much different than loading/writing a full on script in your config in order to eliminate a built in function of the game, yes. I also don't see how using it in the manner that would supposedly "screw up" your hit boxes would ever be an actual beneficial thing to do.

It doesn't really matter though. As I said in my previous post, and you reiterated in that oh so beautiful bold: "...[it] will remain illegal." The actual effect, or lack thereof, is pretty much irrelevant, and I never did enjoy pissing into the wind that much.

Re: ruthLess down

by knockout » Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:07 pm

crawtona wrote:
akiro wrote:But who knows maybe the issue is now people have to learn to adjust and are mad?
I don't know. I'm still not convinced it would actually make sense to use it in the way that it supposedly causes an unfair advantage, but either way, they aren't going to reverse the rule or anything so I guess the only thing to do is remember to unbind it (and then get stuck on small ledges while scrolling through my weapons like an idiot for a week or two).
There you go!

Re: ruthLess down

by knockout » Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:05 pm

Just because it's illegal, doesn't mean it should be. Plus, I was being sarcastic to make a point. The point being, you are banning a mechanic of the game based on your belief that said mechanic should require a higher amount of difficulty to achieve or gives some unfair advantage (even though everybody is just as capable of using it). Just like pubs want you to mash your number keys instead of the quickswitch button.
I know you were being sarcastic. I was just pointing out how weak your point was.

First off, this was banned years ago when it was discovered. And guess what? There was no outrage against it, because it is obvious how it ruins the game. When a player model is constantly going between duck and standing, their hitboxes are constantly switching from duck hitboxes to standing hitboxes. There is no fluid movement for these, so you're basically playing hitbox roulette when you try to shoot a player who is doing this. This is why this bind has been, is, and will remain illegal.

Secondly, it absolutely should require a higher amount of difficulty to achieve this. This is breaking the fundamentals of a FPS game, and making yourself very hard to hit should not be as easy as tweaking a bind. Doesn't that seem a little bit like making your recoil easier to control by tweaking a command? Just because everyone is capable of doing it doesn't mean it should be done. Everyone is capable of aimbotting, but I don't think it's a good idea to allow that.

Re: ruthLess down

by crawtona » Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:01 pm

akiro wrote:But who knows maybe the issue is now people have to learn to adjust and are mad?
I don't know. I'm still not convinced it would actually make sense to use it in the way that it supposedly causes an unfair advantage, but either way, they aren't going to reverse the rule or anything so I guess the only thing to do is remember to unbind it (and then get stuck on small ledges while scrolling through my weapons like an idiot for a week or two).

Re: ruthLess down

by akiro » Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:49 am

First off i wasnt referring to quickswitch and crouch hopping via mosewheel as scripts, i was talking no recoil and other binds people use to change recoil/mechanics of the game based on current weapon being used.


Secondly once again i said quickswitching does absolutely nothing besides eliminating the need to hit more than one button yo perform a function that does not alter the games mechanics in an unfair way. Crouch hopping via mousewheel takes advantage of the severely broken dod/hl hitboxes and makes you crouch hop to further break said hitboxes. If you have to manually hot ctrl repeatedly or whatever button you choose to do it everytime i gurantee it will be way less effective than jist being able to roll your finger quickly. Yes everyone can do it, but does it make it right?

But who knows maybe the issue is now people have to learn to adjust and are mad?

Re: ruthLess down

by naz » Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:40 am

crawtona wrote:
motive wrote:This has always been illegal, and for a good reason: you break a broken game's broken hitboxes even more when you do this shit. It's the same reason spamming hand-signals was banned in CAL/TPG, because your character is flailing around with fucked up hitboxes. That doesn't require any effort either, but it's illegal nonetheless.

There's lots of shit that's "built into the game" that you aren't allowed to do. Illegal spots, boosting, duck spamming, hand signal spamming, 16-bitting if you're a CS player at least... list goes on.
crawtona wrote:It is not impossible in the least to use CTRL (or shift, or any other key on your keyboard) to achieve the same "advantage" that using mousewheel down/up does, it's just a bit more difficult/requires a bit more practice.
Do you really think that you can press a key with your pinky/ring finger faster that the mousescroll event gets fired? I'll write the code for you to test that theory out and prove me wrong.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding how it's being used to some great advantage. I've used it to occasionally hop around a corner (incredibly easy to do with CTRL as well) and also to sprint run more efficiently (sprint, crouch hop into a crouch, also go a tick faster down hill, both completely achievable without mousewheel). How would spamming it be used to an advantage? Seems that would fuck you up more than help you.
This has nothing to do with just a simple hop around a corner. Duck running (originally called the Russian Walk in cs after the guy who discovered it) is where you use mouse wheel to crouch rapidly. One of the things it does it is screws with your hitboxes, making you noticeably hard to hit. The reason it is illegal to bind crouch to mousewheel is that the mousewheel allows you to execute crouches very quickly in rapid succession. It's much harder to abuse this hitting ctrl (or other key) with your pinky.

Top