Charr wrote:We were told to replay the match, as Tox stated. Taylor was trying to mend the situation.
Narc told us "Rules are Rules" when we had a player accidentally rating, so that's what we told him when his team told us to let it slide.
You should at least get your facts straight before storming in here like a 6 year old on a sugar high, making little to no sense at all. You just seem to skim through things and misinterpret nearly everything that is right in front of your face. Very tragic if you have this disability in the real world.
I guess you conveniently missed all the posts that stated TPG ADMINS TREAT EACH CASE INDIVIDUALLY AND INDEPENDENT OF OTHER CASES BASED ON DIFFERENT VARIABLES.
The match where your team rated was different from this match. You're comparing two things with INCONSISTENT variables. THAT is the most illogical thing anyone has done in this thread. Brb comparing and equating apples to oranges. Brb LogicLand. Brb herp derp.
Also missing this part (again):
§8 Disclaimer
TPG admins reserve the right to make independent judgement calls for any rule as necessary. These judgement calls, if made, will supersede any current rules listed above.
Charr wrote:We were told to replay the match, as Tox stated. Taylor was trying to mend the situation.
Narc told us "Rules are Rules" when we had a player accidentally rating, so that's what we told him when his team told us to let it slide.
You should at least get your facts straight before storming in here like a 6 year old on a sugar high, making little to no sense at all. You just seem to skim through things and misinterpret nearly everything that is right in front of your face. Very tragic if you have this disability in the real world.
I guess you conveniently missed all the posts that stated TPG ADMINS TREAT EACH CASE INDIVIDUALLY AND INDEPENDENT OF OTHER CASES BASED ON DIFFERENT VARIABLES.
The match where your team rated was different from this match. You're comparing two things with INCONSISTENT variables. THAT is the most illogical thing anyone has done in this thread. Brb comparing and equating apples to oranges. Brb LogicLand. Brb herp derp.
Also missing this part (again):
§8 Disclaimer
TPG admins reserve the right to make independent judgement calls for any rule as necessary. These judgement calls, if made, will supersede any current rules listed above.
REINFORCING MY POINT. Yet again. Admins following rules in one scenario, and not in another. God dammit, how are you this stupid?
Charr wrote:
You should at least get your facts straight before storming in here like a 6 year old on a sugar high, making little to no sense at all. You just seem to skim through things and misinterpret nearly everything that is right in front of your face. Very tragic if you have this disability in the real world.
@ alex
According to you, admins should just punish people based on their mood. Fucking makes a lot of sense. The rules are on the website for a reason. They are to be taken seriously. If a complication arises, sure let the admin try to handle it. Mend the situation. You're just saying "OH THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT, WHEN THEY WANT. DERPDERP". Sounds fucking illogical and ridiculous.
Charr wrote:@ alex
According to you, admins should just punish people based on their mood. Fucking makes a lot of sense. The rules are on the website for a reason. They are to be taken seriously. If a complication arises, sure let the admin try to handle it. Mend the situation. You're just saying "OH THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT, WHEN THEY WANT. DERPDERP". Sounds fucking illogical and ridiculous.
Charr wrote:@ alex
According to you, admins should just punish people based on their mood. Fucking makes a lot of sense. The rules are on the website for a reason. They are to be taken seriously. If a complication arises, sure let the admin try to handle it. Mend the situation. You're just saying "OH THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT, WHEN THEY WANT. DERPDERP". Sounds fucking illogical and ridiculous.
Charr wrote:@ alex
According to you, admins should just punish people based on their mood. Fucking makes a lot of sense. The rules are on the website for a reason. They are to be taken seriously. If a complication arises, sure let the admin try to handle it. Mend the situation. You're just saying "OH THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT, WHEN THEY WANT. DERPDERP". Sounds fucking illogical and ridiculous.
Hyperbole is fun, but it only makes you look stupid.
Charr wrote:REINFORCING MY POINT. Yet again. Admins following rules in one scenario, and not in another. God dammit, how are you this stupid?
If the variables were different between these cases, then you have no fucking point.
Is it that difficult to understand? The circumstances regarding your past match =/= the circumstances regarding this previous match.
Does this simple statement make sense? Or...? Let me know if you can understand that. Because I have my doubts.
What variables are different? You seem to be trying to convince yourself that you are correct, rather than trying to convince me.
We rate = FF Loss both teams.
Another team rates = Rematch
Another team in lower rates = Overturned.
How the fuck is this not making sense in your tiny little brain? What "variables"? People are rating, punishment is varying. Makes. No. Sense. You are on another planet.
Charr wrote:@ alex
According to you, admins should just punish people based on their mood. Fucking makes a lot of sense. The rules are on the website for a reason. They are to be taken seriously. If a complication arises, sure let the admin try to handle it. Mend the situation. You're just saying "OH THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT, WHEN THEY WANT. DERPDERP". Sounds fucking illogical and ridiculous.
toxinatoR wrote:I handled the dispute for the MVPZ vs MINDFLOW match.. Since it was a playoff match.. i felt that having a rematch would be the better alternative. (YOUR LEADER WANTED TO DROP THE DISPUTE AND FORGET ABOUT THE WHOLE THING.) Rather than having taylub drop the dispute I said you should just Replay the match. I knew he would agree with this since he was willing to drop the dispute in the first place.. I'm sick of hearing "Rules are Rules" ... Read above(§8 Disclaimer). I didn't handle the quarterfinal match with TA and KS if it had caught my eye I would have proposed the same thing. Rematch. Since it was a playoff match and the rating prob didn't have anything to do with the outcome.. The Rating rules will certainly be changed for next season.. One thing you should all remember is this is like season fucking 26? how long ago were these rules written? I feel the the rating rule mainly pertains the 'South American' ARGENTINEAN players... aka Karl1san.. would rate and crouch hop around everywhere being unhittable. But the rule will definitely be changed.
Charr wrote:What variables are different? You seem to be trying to convince yourself that you are correct, rather than trying to convince me.
We rate = FF Loss both teams.
Another team rates = Rematch
Another team in lower rates = Overturned.
How the fuck is this not making sense in your tiny little brain? What "variables"? People are rating, punishment is varying. Makes. No. Sense. You are on another planet.
I'm sorry. I'm going to need confirmation on whether you understand my previous statement before I elaborate further. Discussions are give and take. Right now you're just taking with zero intention to give...
...Like the whore you are.
(nugz already covered some of the variables that are inconsistent between cases, by the way.)
What was the score of your match where both teams rated?
Charr wrote:What variables are different? You seem to be trying to convince yourself that you are correct, rather than trying to convince me.
We rate = FF Loss both teams.
Another team rates = Rematch
Another team in lower rates = Overturned.
How the fuck is this not making sense in your tiny little brain? What "variables"? People are rating, punishment is varying. Makes. No. Sense. You are on another planet.
I'm sorry. I'm going to need confirmation on whether you understand my previous statement before I elaborate further. Discussions are give and take. Right now you're just taking with zero intention to give...
oh my god! I just spent 30 minutes ignoring my girlfriends text messages so I could finish reading this thread and this idiot, "Charr" is still allowed to be posting on these threads and not banned from TPG for unsportsmanllike-conduct from TPG. Please take action against this idiot.
if sears or TPG admins don't do anything (such as banning him permanently), please, taylor, remove this friend from possibly your real life, or just your team if you don't have a real-life bond yet. he is embarrassing the reputation of "mindflow."
sorry it came to this taylor, but your teammate, (although not starting it) has made it really bad for the reputation of your team. please cut him.
acetamino wrote:oh my god! I just spent 30 minutes ignoring my girlfriends text messages so I could finish reading this thread and this idiot, "Charr" is still allowed to be posting on these threads and not banned from TPG for unsportsmanl-like-conduct from TPG. Please take action against this idiot.
if sears or TPG admids don't do anything (such as banning him permanently), please, taylor, remove this friend from possibly your real life, or just your team if you don't have a real-life bond yet. he is embarrassing the reputation of "mindflow."
sorry it came to this taylor, but your teammate, (although not starting it) has made it really bad for the reputation of your team. please cut him.
acetamino wrote:oh my god! I just spent 30 minutes ignoring my girlfriends text messages so I could finish reading this thread and this idiot, "Charr" is still allowed to be posting on these threads and not banned from TPG for unsportsmanllike-conduct from TPG. Please take action against this idiot.
if sears or TPG admins don't do anything (such as banning him permanently), please, taylor, remove this friend from possibly your real life, or just your team if you don't have a real-life bond yet. he is embarrassing the reputation of "mindflow."
sorry it came to this taylor, but your teammate, (although not starting it) has made it really bad for the reputation of your team. please cut him.
edit- drunk spelling or grammar mistakes.
It's too funny watching him talk about enforcing the rules, all up until we present rules that contradict his opinion (and are "higher" in nature). Then watching him just lash out like a little girl and talk about living in LogicLand.
Logic...Land...that's as creative as he can get...
acetamino wrote:oh my god! I just spent 30 minutes ignoring my girlfriends text messages so I could finish reading this thread and this idiot, "Charr" is still allowed to be posting on these threads and not banned from TPG for unsportsmanl-like-conduct from TPG. Please take action against this idiot.
if sears or TPG admids don't do anything (such as banning him permanently), please, taylor, remove this friend from possibly your real life, or just your team if you don't have a real-life bond yet. he is embarrassing the reputation of "mindflow."
sorry it came to this taylor, but your teammate, (although not starting it) has made it really bad for the reputation of your team. please cut him.
Why the fuck would anyone care about "reputation" over a game where people attack others for their own rule breaking? Lol. You're angry, bad at video games, and ignore your girlfriend. You're such a great person.
acetamino wrote:oh my god! I just spent 30 minutes ignoring my girlfriends text messages so I could finish reading this thread and this idiot, "Charr" is still allowed to be posting on these threads and not banned from TPG for unsportsmanllike-conduct from TPG. Please take action against this idiot.
if sears or TPG admins don't do anything (such as banning him permanently), please, taylor, remove this friend from possibly your real life, or just your team if you don't have a real-life bond yet. he is embarrassing the reputation of "mindflow."
sorry it came to this taylor, but your teammate, (although not starting it) has made it really bad for the reputation of your team. please cut him.
edit- drunk spelling or grammar mistakes.
It's too funny watching him talk about enforcing the rules, all up until we present rules that contradict his opinion (and are "higher" in nature). Then watching him just lash out like a little girl and talk about living in LogicLand.
Logic...Land...that's as creative as he can get...
"Lash out"? You're the one who actually logged into this board for the sole purpose of arguing with almost no facts on the matter. Sounds legit.
Charr wrote:Why the fuck would anyone care about "reputation" over a game where people attack others for their own rule breaking? Lol. You're angry, bad at video games, and ignore your girlfriend. You're such a great person.
Dear Char,
Confirm or deny the following: the match in which you received an ff loss you LOST by a single digit number of points before even receiving said FF loss.
Charr wrote:Why the fuck would anyone care about "reputation" over a game where people attack others for their own rule breaking? Lol. You're angry, bad at video games, and ignore your girlfriend. You're such a great person.
Charr wrote:Why the fuck would anyone care about "reputation" over a game where people attack others for their own rule breaking? Lol. You're angry, bad at video games, and ignore your girlfriend. You're such a great person.
Dear Char,
Confirm or deny the following: the match in which you received an ff loss you LOST by a single digit number of points before even receiving said FF loss.
A simple "true" or "false" will do.
Thanks,
Future LogicLand resident
Tell you what. You explain how it matters, and I'll check the SS. I was actually referring to that case as one that the admins handled correctly. I'm a little curious why you'd bring that one up?
Charr wrote:Tell you what. You explain how it matters, and I'll check the SS. I was actually referring to that case as one that the admins handled correctly. I'm a little curious why you'd bring that one up?
Really? So in one match you lose by less than 10, and in another you lose by 100, and you want me to explain the significance? You want me to tell you how these cases are different?
-I am frustrated, by the lack of educational discussion you want to have on the subject.
-My girlfriend has class early in the morning so ignoring her right now is fine, and explaining this discussion to her tomorrow will make her laugh just as hard as, alex or anyone else (there's a reason why your teammates are not supporting you publicly and you are about to have two banned accounts. even she will get that.) because she will understand it, unlock you seem to be.
Charr wrote:Tell you what. You explain how it matters, and I'll check the SS. I was actually referring to that case as one that the admins handled correctly. I'm a little curious why you'd bring that one up?
Really? So in one match you lose by less than 10, and in another you lose by 100, and you want me to explain the significance? You want me to tell you how these cases are different?
Are you fucking stupid?
Hmm? The one where we both received an FF loss, they had someone cheating. We disputed. for whatever reason, they received 0 points. Our backup player was rating. Everyone on our team thought we should have won. I checked the rules, and said we both should get an FF loss. Sure enough, that's what happened. It was a complex case as far as disputes go...Yet when simple rating disputes arise, there are so many "variables" as you call them, that need to be taken into account. Legit as my shit.
Charr wrote:Hmm? The one where we both received an FF loss, they had someone cheating. We disputed. for whatever reason, they received 0 points. Our backup player was rating. Everyone on our team thought we should have won. I checked the rules, and said we both should get an FF loss. Sure enough, that's what happened. It was a complex case as far as disputes go...Yet when simple rating disputes arise, there are so many "variables" as you call them, that need to be taken into account. Legit as my shit.
They didn't have someone cheating for sure, he just didn't record one half.
You're escaping my point, which is funny to see. Don't squirm from the truth, bro. You lost a match by an unbelievably narrow margin and STILL broke the rules, thus got your FF loss. Whereas vs. MVPz you lost by a much larger margin (2 caps...). And you think these two cases are able to be judged THE SAME?
Seriously. SERIOUSLY. THIS is why TPG has the rule where admins treat each case individually, because of idiots like you who interpret every case as being equal. These cases are anything but equal. There are serious inconsistencies between them.
Charr wrote:Tell you what. You explain how it matters, and I'll check the SS. I was actually referring to that case as one that the admins handled correctly. I'm a little curious why you'd bring that one up?
Really? So in one match you lose by less than 10, and in another you lose by 100, and you want me to explain the significance? You want me to tell you how these cases are different?
Are you fucking stupid?
Thebest wrote:Guessing Char is Kyle Allaire.
Kid gets shit on by everyone who plays him, can see why he would dispute over something as stupid as rates.
Charr wrote:Hmm? The one where we both received an FF loss, they had someone cheating. We disputed. for whatever reason, they received 0 points. Our backup player was rating. Everyone on our team thought we should have won. I checked the rules, and said we both should get an FF loss. Sure enough, that's what happened. It was a complex case as far as disputes go...Yet when simple rating disputes arise, there are so many "variables" as you call them, that need to be taken into account. Legit as my shit.
They didn't have someone cheating for sure, he just didn't record one half.
You're escaping my point, which is funny to see. Don't squirm from the truth, bro. You lost a match by an unbelievably narrow margin and STILL broke the rules, thus got your FF loss. Whereas vs. MVPz you lost by a much larger margin (2 caps...). And you think these two cases are able to be judged THE SAME?
Seriously. SERIOUSLY. THIS is why TPG has the rule where admins treat each case individually, because of idiots like you who interpret every case as being equal. These cases are anything but equal. There are serious inconsistencies between them.
You're escaping my point. The rules are very clear on what happens when you rate. These rules were not upheld. Why would TPG be taken seriously if they can simply change each rule whenever they please? Your argument is completely unrealistic and is off-topic really.
Charr wrote:Hmm? The one where we both received an FF loss, they had someone cheating. We disputed. for whatever reason, they received 0 points. Our backup player was rating. Everyone on our team thought we should have won. I checked the rules, and said we both should get an FF loss. Sure enough, that's what happened. It was a complex case as far as disputes go...Yet when simple rating disputes arise, there are so many "variables" as you call them, that need to be taken into account. Legit as my shit.
They didn't have someone cheating for sure, he just didn't record one half.
You're escaping my point, which is funny to see. Don't squirm from the truth, bro. You lost a match by an unbelievably narrow margin and STILL broke the rules, thus got your FF loss. Whereas vs. MVPz you lost by a much larger margin (2 caps...). And you think these two cases are able to be judged THE SAME?
Seriously. SERIOUSLY. THIS is why TPG has the rule where admins treat each case individually, because of idiots like you who interpret every case as being equal. These cases are anything but equal. There are serious inconsistencies between them.
You're escaping my point. The rules are very clear on what happens when you rate. These rules were not upheld. Why would TPG be taken seriously if they can simply change each rule whenever they please? Your argument is completely unrealistic and is off-topic really.
alex kirk wrote:
They didn't have someone cheating for sure, he just didn't record one half.
You're escaping my point, which is funny to see. Don't squirm from the truth, bro. You lost a match by an unbelievably narrow margin and STILL broke the rules, thus got your FF loss. Whereas vs. MVPz you lost by a much larger margin (2 caps...). And you think these two cases are able to be judged THE SAME?
Seriously. SERIOUSLY. THIS is why TPG has the rule where admins treat each case individually, because of idiots like you who interpret every case as being equal. These cases are anything but equal. There are serious inconsistencies between them.
You're escaping my point. The rules are very clear on what happens when you rate. These rules were not upheld. Why would TPG be taken seriously if they can simply change each rule whenever they please? Your argument is completely unrealistic and is off-topic really.
HOLD UP, TPG IS TAKEN SERIOUSLY? News to me!
I'm sure a lot of things are "news to you", since you join threads several pages late and add horse shit to it.
Charr wrote:You're escaping my point. The rules are very clear on what happens when you rate. These rules were not upheld. Why would TPG be taken seriously if they can simply change each rule whenever they please? Your argument is completely unrealistic and is off-topic really.
Oh. My. Fucking. Goodness.
1) Admins have the right to treat each case independently even when it goes against the "default" ruling. THIS RULE IS ABOVE THE "DEFAULT" RULE REGARDING RATING.
2) When two cases are different, they will be treated differently.
3) Your first FF loss =/= your FF loss against MVPz. THERE WERE DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES.
4) THUS, different treatments regarding these two DIFFERENT rating infractions.
Are you really not picking this shit up? This is so fucking elementary it hurts. It's more elementary than jules winnfield's sacked lunch.
1) Admins have the right to treat each case independently even when it goes against the "default" ruling. THIS RULE IS ABOVE THE "DEFAULT" RULE REGARDING RATING.
2) When two cases are different, they will be treated differently.
3) Your first FF loss =/= your FF loss against MVPz. THERE WERE DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES.
4) THUS, different treatments regarding these two DIFFERENT rating infractions.
Are you really not picking this shit up? This is so fucking elementary it hurts. It's more elementary than jules winnfield's sacked lunch.
Charr wrote:You're escaping my point. The rules are very clear on what happens when you rate. These rules were not upheld. Why would TPG be taken seriously if they can simply change each rule whenever they please? Your argument is completely unrealistic and is off-topic really.
Oh. My. Fucking. Goodness.
1) Admins have the right to treat each case independently even when it goes against the "default" ruling. THIS RULE IS ABOVE THE "DEFAULT" RULE REGARDING RATING.
2) When two cases are different, they will be treated differently.
3) Your first FF loss =/= your FF loss against MVPz. THERE WERE DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES.
4) THUS, different treatments regarding these two DIFFERENT rating infractions.
Are you really not picking this shit up? This is so fucking elementary it hurts. It's more elementary than jules winnfield's sacked lunch.
There is no reason to treat them differently. Simply referring to the rules would suffice in both cases. It's so elementary it fucking hurts. How many times do I need to say it? The circumstances are exactly the same. Someone. Rated. Fucking right over your head.
a little more.
