So...

mg_ · Post by **mg_** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:16 pm

alex kirk wrote:
mg_ wrote:The information is in the picture in previous posts. It is not hard. It isn't some spooky mystery, Shaggy. The thread is there. The picture explains pretty much everything. Read this super secret thread that is stated verbatim in my super secret picture.

I'm not linking the thread now out of belligerence to how ridiculous you're being. The picture I posted has the thread by title. This isn't hard.

You've made it hard. The picture also explains a lot. Get it, ya dig?
If the picture explained everything then you realize that just makes it appear as though you are equating defiance to a baby rapist all because he negged you 4 times? The "why" is kind of important. Context matters. Your picture doesn't give context to outsiders. You're part of the story, so of course it seems obvious. But for those of us who don't know what the shit is going on and aren't presumptuous people, it's not.

Then I suggest you read the thread and go get your context because I guess you're out of luck otherwise.

mg_ · Post by **mg_** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:17 pm

alex kirk wrote:P.S. Diso should be on this ranking. He should be 4 slots above 10.

I don't think anyone rivals Diso. That's like the god of white trash.

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:18 pm

mg_ wrote:Then I suggest you read the thread and go get your context because I guess you're out of luck otherwise.

Could have just said, "defiance negged me because I condemned Joe Pa for his actions." In which case I would have said, "poor reason to neg considering Joe Pa's actions are reprehensible."

Friendly conversing, or at least civil conversing, is easier than you think, Mitch.

...You cunt...

mg_ · Post by **mg_** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:19 pm

alex kirk wrote:
mg_ wrote:Then I suggest you read the thread and go get your context because I guess you're out of luck otherwise.
Could have just said, "defiance negged me because I condemned Joe Pa for his actions." In which case I would have said, "poor reason to neg considering Joe Pa's actions are reprehensible."

Friendly conversing, or at least civil conversing, is easier than you think, Mitch.

...You cunt...

I could have, but it was soooo much more fun this way. :>

Besides, I thought you were intentionally being obtuse.

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:28 pm

mg_ wrote:I could have, but it was soooo much more fun this way. :>

Besides, I thought you were intentionally being obtuse.

No, just wanted to hear from you what all of this was about because I like both of you guys. I disagree with him negging you for condemning Joe Paterno if that's what started all of this. Similarly I disagree with some of the things you've said because I would call them a bit excessive. Doesn't matter because at the end of the day neither of you are half as cool as I am, so no care.

mg_ · Post by **mg_** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:35 pm

I thought this was class Alex Kirk who comes to the defense of any cheater by having unreasonable doubts about a banned cheater cheating.

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:38 pm

mg_ wrote:I thought this was class Alex Kirk who comes to the defense of any cheater by having unreasonable doubts about a banned cheater cheating.

[img]http://starcasm.net/wp-content/uploads/ ... te.gif[img]

Please. I don't even remember the people I defended, but I'm pretty sure most of them proved themselves on LAN, became at least mildly respected players, or at worst were never banned.

Except Kevin Gardner. That guy never made anything of himself.

acetamino · Post by **acetamino** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:47 pm

Did a whole lot of +rep's on this thread and gave none of those to _mg.

Go troll a WoW forum. Your relevance in this game at this point in time is about as small as LogicLand's IQ.

mg_ · Post by **mg_** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:24 pm

acetamino wrote:Did a whole lot of +rep's on this thread and gave none of those to _mg.

Go troll a WoW forum. Your relevance in this game at this point in time is about as small as LogicLand's IQ.

unpro · Post by **unpro** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:28 pm

acetamino wrote:Did a whole lot of +rep's on this thread and gave none of those to _mg.

Go troll a WoW forum. Your relevance in this game at this point in time is about as small as LogicLand's IQ.

yes, because 1911 was brought back solely so we can talk about dod.

Sears · Post by **Sears** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:32 pm

jeez mitch, have you been taking popularity lessons from scott fleener?

mg_ · Post by **mg_** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:32 pm

Sears wrote:jeez mitch, have you been taking popularity lessons from scott fleener?

He was 2popular2stopular.

james- · Post by **james-** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:53 pm

You kids are taking this thread WAY too seriously. Honestly, this is the first time I've seen logic implemented in a thread specifically designed to flame someone for being a huge PBR chuggin' red neck that supports touching kiddies in their nether regions.

Take a step back, realize that there's no prize for "winning a flame thread" and talk some shit.

Fluxx is about the only one who got the gist of this thread, and based on the intelligence he's shown the community in the past years, I'd say it was a coincidence. I really hope the military pays for your higher-education... although, judging by your claims, you must have already been promoted to supreme allied commander by now, right? Pretty sure you can make a career out of it.

bonerhaus · Post by **bonerhaus** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:01 pm

soseriousthread

likwid · Post by **likwid** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:13 pm

james- wrote:You kids are taking this thread WAY too seriously. Honestly, this is the first time I've seen logic implemented in a thread specifically designed to flame someone for being a huge PBR chuggin' red neck that supports touching kiddies in their nether regions.

Take a step back, realize that there's no prize for "winning a flame thread" and talk some shit.

Fluxx is about the only one who got the gist of this thread, and based on the intelligence he's shown the community in the past years, I'd say it was a coincidence. I really hope the military pays for your higher-education... although, judging by your claims, you must have already been promoted to supreme allied commander by now, right? Pretty sure you can make a career out of it.

WHOA. HOLD UP.

Why do you have to bring PBR into this?

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:17 pm

james- wrote:You kids are taking this thread WAY too seriously. Honestly, this is the first time I've seen logic implemented in a thread specifically designed to flame someone for being a huge PBR chuggin' red neck that supports touching kiddies in their nether regions.

Take a step back, realize that there's no prize for "winning a flame thread" and talk some shit.

Fluxx is about the only one who got the gist of this thread, and based on the intelligence he's shown the community in the past years, I'd say it was a coincidence. I really hope the military pays for your higher-education... although, judging by your claims, you must have already been promoted to supreme allied commander by now, right? Pretty sure you can make a career out of it.

Irony-ish?

james- · Post by **james-** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:21 pm

[youtube]mpQYsnmAC1E[/youtube]

james- · Post by **james-** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:23 pm

I'm taking this seriously, alex?

Sorry to let you down, but I'm only here to try and add fuel to the flames. I sincerely miss gotfrag and the raging immaturity and pointless flame wars.

Wear more converse.

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:26 pm

james- wrote:Wear more converse.

Low blow, bro.

james- · Post by **james-** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:38 pm

I shoulda gone lower. I was expecting to get the neg train.

COME AT ME BRO, YOU CAN'T TAKE ON THIS TRIPLE DIGIT REP POWA!

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:42 pm

james- wrote:I shoulda gone lower. I was expecting to get the neg train.

COME AT ME BRO, YOU CAN'T TAKE ON THIS TRIPLE DIGIT REP POWA!

Would you LIKE a neg train? Three negs and you'll be red ;P

james- · Post by **james-** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:46 pm

wtf how did i get to 300?

I honestly don't understand how this works.

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:48 pm

james- wrote:wtf how did i get to 300?

I honestly don't understand how this works.

Every time I rep you, you get 59 points.

Swiss · Post by **Swiss** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:07 pm

So...

i think everyone is glossing over the real issue here: the fact that ricky is at a meager 4. i dont think thats giving him enough credit, at least move him up a couple of places.

img · Post by **img** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:48 pm

Ricky is the poster child of white trash

Bromley · Post by **Bromley** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:06 am

Stamp makes better threads than this bro, get some new meterial cause ths is your worst work yet. Maybe you could start a football thread on a forum about a game you dont play?!

Post by **ThatsRight** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:58 am

Team Sas should have been "10".

http://www.gotfrag.com/dod/gallery/image/11739/

stealthlol · Post by **stealthlol** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:25 am

alex kirk wrote:Please. I don't even remember the people I defended, but I'm pretty sure most of them proved themselves on LAN, became at least mildly respected players, or at worst were never banned.

Except Kevin Gardner. That guy never made anything of himself.

I read the first few words and knew your post was going to end that way.

or at worst were never banned.

At least I've got that going for me~

mg_ · Post by **mg_** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:22 am

Bromley wrote:Stamp makes better threads than this bro, get some new meterial cause ths is your worst work yet. Maybe you could start a football thread on a forum about a game you dont play?!

Don't you have some Nugz ball ridin' to do?

Bromley · Post by **Bromley** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:30 am

Nope, havn't talked to nugz in months. Care to try again ?

College > Online Games

mg_ · Post by **mg_** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:48 am

Bromley wrote:Nope, havn't talked to nugz in months. Care to try again ?

College > Online Games

Smart people multitask.

Not shocked you're an idiot.

And why exactly are you posting on a forum for a game you don't play anymore?

Bromley · Post by **Bromley** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:54 am

a.) Idiots don't hold 90 averages
b.) I play for a team on Sundays
c.) You shouldn't jump to conclusions, It makes you look like an pompous jackass
d.) Again, Why are you here?

mg_ · Post by **mg_** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:22 am

Bromley wrote:a.) Idiots don't hold 90 averages
b.) I play for a team on Sundays
c.) You shouldn't jump to conclusions, It makes you look like an pompous jackass
d.) Again, Why are you here?

90 averages? lol.

You must be in some lame online school.

I pub from time to time when it suits me.

Post by **ThatsRight** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:40 am

Bromley wrote:
a.) Idiots don't hold 90 averages

Yes they do. Going to college doesn't make you intelligent, as we can see from that pathetic reasoning you just trotted out. A 90 average means absolutely nothing out of context. It's highly dependent on your school or type of program, and even then, it's almost meaningless.

Any idiot can spit out largely useless information onto a test. There's a hell of a lot of people who "get good grades" but are not smart and won't succeed. They don't have any common sense, communication skill, or ability to think in any other way than memorizing. I'm sure someday you'll throw out a "I'm a 90 average" when you get passed up in every interview or promotion.

c.) You shouldn't jump to conclusions, It makes you look like an pompous jackass

No, thinking you're suddenly not an idiot because you got a 90 average in intro to Biology is pompous, you stupid fuck.

Post by **ThatsRight** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:05 am

Fluxx is about the only one who got the gist of this thread, and based on the intelligence he's shown the community in the past years, I'd say it was a coincidence. I really hope the military pays for your higher-education... although, judging by your claims, you must have already been promoted to supreme allied commander by now, right? Pretty sure you can make a career out of it.

See, this is how it's done.

Stormin Norman

scorch- · Post by **scorch-** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:29 am

I didn't get 90 averages in college. I am jealous of this Bromley fellow. Would you care to share your secrets?

How do I negative rep mitch for calling a child molester white trash? That's offensive to white trash everywhere.

Post by **ThatsRight** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:42 am

Joe died on Saturday, but we didn't get around to reporting it until Monday. What's overlooked in all of this is how if the doctors would have acted sooner, cancer wouldn't have ruined his life.

lolinus · Post by **lolinus** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:53 am

Grades dosen't represent knowledge, grades represent how much you know on a test. Not how much you do really know when the course/class is over.

Post by **ThatsRight** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:14 am

lolinus wrote:Grades dosen't represent knowledge, grades represent how much you know on a test. Not how much you do really know when the course/class is over.

I got a "90 average" and put in about 1/4 of the time studying. I'd always hear people bitching that they spend 8 hours studying or "oh, I spent all weekend". MAYBE we both got "A's", but in the end, who's smarter? They can spend hours and hours memorizing something and spit it back. I can look at it once, and know it, and apply it. Which one do you think translates better to working on client who has billable hours?

Not to mention, a test with multiple choice has the answer right there. Could those people get all those same questions right if it was fill in the blank instead? I doubt it. Tests aren't effective, and one of the best professors I ever had did not give them. Ever. It was the hardest and most beneficial class that I ever took.

School is not about the facts or formulas you "learned". It teaches you how to learn what you'll need going forward, how to multitask, get along with people, meet deadlines/specifications, and not buckle under pressure. The process is what's important, not what "grade" you got.

Soft skills take you places. You can be smart, but good teams have people on it they want to be around. It's why the 3.9 "smart person" will be shocked after the 3.5 student with the clubs, internships, and people skills to get managers and clients to like them will be walking circles around them in the workforce.

In fact, the smartass who thinks he's smart because he gets a "90 average", like Bromley, is a liability. Even the best expert in there field knows the smallest fraction of what there's to know. Know-it-alls aren't liked, and they aren't good at what they do because they're unable to recognize their own faults for self improvement or defer to people who do actually know. They collapse in the face of adversity. He'll be spinning wheels wasting time when something doesn't fit into their little memorization game, because they don't actually have the intelligence to work through problems.

cassinoroyale · Post by **cassinoroyale** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:22 am

It is only me who never read Reh's replies/threads because they're too damn long? HOLLA @ ME!

Let's assume that most of the answers will be a yes so --> insert your didntreadlolololol gif here <--

Back to the thread:

Post by **ThatsRight** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:26 am

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:32 am

Reh wrote:Soft skills take you places. You can be smart, but good teams have people on it they want to be around. It's why the 3.9 "smart person" will be shocked after the 3.5 student with the clubs, internships, and people skills to get managers and clients to like them will be walking circles around them in the workforce.

Bingo. This is why I always tell people the same thing when they ask me for college advice: email every professor in your department and ask if they have anything you can do for them - research, internship, aiding them in whatever projects they may be doing, etc.

I mean, I only have a bachelor's in psych/neuroscience and had multiple job offers in Chicago with moderate salaries for entry-level work based in research aid and basic counseling work. I guess depending on what you consider moderate for entry-level work.

Bromley · Post by **Bromley** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:03 am

idiot - a person of the lowest order in a former and discarded classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.

You guys are confused I never said I was intelligent, I said I wasn't an idiot however you got there is beyond me . I'm doing iss+ with a extra cred course on encryption. So be my guest and try it cause its not a cake walk.

AGAIN! Never did I boast my marks in saying i'm better than anyone you took that way out of context. Just pointing out the fact I don't know any idiots with 90+ marks on exams and certifications.

-repped allll day long. Much love

Post by **ThatsRight** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:08 am

Bromley wrote:Just pointing out the fact I don't know any idiots with 90+ marks on exams and certifications.

Bromley · Post by **Bromley** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:09 am

broken link is broken

Now that you have fixed it, That was soooo clever! Truly I would have NEVER thought of that!

Beas · Post by **Beas** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:11 am

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:16 am

Bromley wrote:idiot - a person of the lowest order in a former and discarded classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.

You guys are confused I never said I was intelligent, I said I wasn't an idiot however you got there is beyond me . I'm doing iss+ with a extra cred course on encryption. So be my guest and try it cause its not a cake walk.

AGAIN! Never did I boast my marks in saying i'm better than anyone you took that way out of context. Just pointing out the fact I don't know any idiots with 90+ marks on exams and certifications.

-repped allll day long. Much love

Just so you realize, I wasn't calling you stupid or saying you aren't intelligent. Just agreeing with what ThatsRight said regarding education that is strictly based on curriculum vs. one that is more well-rounded with experience.

Theworst · Post by **Theworst** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:42 am

[youtube]lVmmYMwFj1I[/youtube]

Bromley · Post by **Bromley** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:44 am

Mr.Kirk I agree with everything said above me, Maybe it was rather stupid for me to say what I said but I never intended it to be taken the way it was. I was more referring to all the hateful comments reh posted.

Ps. I have like 30 rep left do you really think I would want to piss you off Kirk. I dont want the neg train pulling into my station ^_~

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:52 am

Bromley wrote:Mr.Kirk I agree with everything said above me, Maybe it was rather stupid for me to say what I said but I never intended it to be taken the way it was. I was more referring to all the hateful comments reh posted.

Ps. I have like 30 rep left do you really think I would want to piss you off Kirk. I dont want the neg train pulling into my station ^_~

Just clarifying that I'm not giving you shit here!

How white trash is Defiance?