STAMPERS DOWN

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:09 am

Rob wrote:I like the idea of TPG-AC releasing demos. It's a pretty basic measure of accountability. They aren't infallible, as seen in poizoned's and rdk's cases.

I really doubt there's any question whether stamp cheated in the demo AC has of him, but it's still a good idea in general.

And koreanknife.

stile · Post by **stile** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:11 am

cassinoroyale wrote:
Rob wrote:
cassinoroyale wrote:I like Rob's pompous texts. I find amusing his ability of discourse on several subjects writing like a semantics' CAL-I champ. It causes me a odd serendipity whenever I read how roll a simple idea into a gigantic composition. Keep it up, man! You are my hero!

Really?? Now I think you're just projecting your insecurities. My post looks pretty normal to me. Just a bit long, if anything.

I'm able to understand perfectly well anything you write. I said it before and I will say it again: I just like to pull your leg everytime I got the chance because you like to reply it back with astonishing arguments of how exquisite, imperious, self-assertive, polite and educated you are.

NOT.

Oh, and inb4 you replying with something related to my country,

seems like you have a grudge.

scorch- · Post by **scorch-** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:14 am

Rob wrote:I like the idea of TPG-AC releasing demos. It's a pretty basic measure of accountability. They aren't infallible, as seen in poizoned's and rdk's cases.

I really doubt there's any question whether stamp cheated in the demo AC has of him, but it's still a good idea in general.

This just leads to pissed off retards trying to revolt against the 3 people willing to spend hours a week watching demos. No one wants this.

e: also, retards learning what not to do while cheating.

taylor · Post by **taylor** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:25 am

dear linus's positive rep

RIP
Svensk: im fighting keving "stealthlol" gardener first
Svensk: i took him from 430 to 398
Svensk: i got him down from 430 to 294
Svensk: that took awhile
18:14 - Svensk: someone -repped you
18:18 - s t e a l t h l o l: Wrong move.

+500 to -77 it was a good fight linus

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:26 am

taylu_b wrote:dear linus's positive rep

RIP

s t e a l t h l o l: Care to help me neg train linus? He took me down ~400
alexkirk: Sure!
s t e a l t h l o l: Woo!

Some people just don't know their place.

lolinus · Post by **lolinus** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:27 am

Look at stealth needing backup to take me down.

RIP my rep.

bonerhaus · Post by **bonerhaus** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:28 am

+reps for all!

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:29 am

lolinus wrote:Look at stealth needing backup to take me down.

RIP my rep.

He doesn't need it. We just scratch each other's backs. Power in numbers, my friend...power in numbers...

Inb4 Superbad "back located on my cock" joke.

bonerhaus · Post by **bonerhaus** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:31 am

how do you guys neg so hugely??? my rep giving is limited to 3...

defrag · Post by **defrag** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:32 am

lolinus wrote:
Stamp wrote:Good job Turkeys for banning my bro and I for cheating. Even thought Narc won't prove it. Here is a the truth....

Cheaters:

PEACE.
I think you forgot the greatest of them all, dustinyoung.

I don't see cableguy on this list either.

7 pages overnight... Very nice

lolinus · Post by **lolinus** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:35 am

bonerhaus wrote:how do you guys neg so hugely??? my rep giving is limited to 3...

kirk have i guess his rep does like 60, stealth's rep did 50 something.

PS. better luck next time kvngrndr~

Now get me back please.

vertex · Post by **vertex** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:46 am

I got the same shit like 6-7 years ago when i was younger, shit happens life goes on.. but still pretty sure he toggled here and there so it doesn't really surprise me..

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:49 am

bonerhaus wrote:how do you guys neg so hugely??? my rep giving is limited to 3...

Because Sears is a kind, loving master and doesn't hinder my ridiculous popularity.

lolinus wrote:
bonerhaus wrote:how do you guys neg so hugely??? my rep giving is limited to 3...
kirk have i guess his rep does like 60, stealth's rep did 50 something.

PS. better luck next time kvngrndr~

Now get me back please.

Negged.

Miller` · Post by **Miller`** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:56 am

Don't want AC team to release the demo, I want somebody to just make a straight-up cheater movie. Those are so much more fun.

bonerhaus · Post by **bonerhaus** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:56 am

i +repped as much as my little finger could.

stile · Post by **stile** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:57 am

I plus repped you linus. I don't even like to use the system so show some gratitude.

lolinus · Post by **lolinus** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:57 am

I'll defend my rep.

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:59 am

lolinus wrote:I'll defend my rep.

Big mistake trying to neg me.

Prepare to be perpetually red!

taylor · Post by **taylor** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:01 am

defiance · Post by **defiance** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:02 am

toxinatoR wrote:Few years? Cheating is a one year ban. Having them send in demos every match doesn't matter. They suck in matches, its when they started to continuously drop 30's in 12mans when eyebrows started to raise. And the demos were sent to us, we don't go on wild goose chases trying to find people cheat. Maybe defiance or jrod do idk.. The fact is they were warned both publicly and privately that it was a matter of time until they get caught.

HEY!

my goose chases are NOT wild!!!

lolinus · Post by **lolinus** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:02 am

alex kirk wrote:
lolinus wrote:I'll defend my rep.
Big mistake trying to neg me.

Prepare to be perpetually red!

I'm not scared of your huge repping power. Do your best!
(i heard the brave will prevail so it's worth a try).

bonerhaus · Post by **bonerhaus** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:04 am

how many neg reps do you need for ban?

lolinus · Post by **lolinus** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:04 am

-1000

bonerhaus · Post by **bonerhaus** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:05 am

gooood lord.

Sears · Post by **Sears** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:27 am

I changed it from -500 to -1000 when I unbanned Stamp. He still didn't last a day.

dorraj · Post by **dorraj** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:28 am

Marshall_D wrote:i feel this need to call jarrod fat and ugly. please explain

You mad, faggot? I feel the need to call*. You're stupid, eh?

chimpanzebra · Post by **chimpanzebra** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:30 am

That clown is so scary looking.

CharlieGiteau · Post by **CharlieGiteau** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:36 am

chimpanzebra wrote:That clown is so scary looking.

That movie was terrible...

Rambizzle · Post by **Rambizzle** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:37 am

in on neg train

chooooooo chooooooooooo

Sears · Post by **Sears** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:39 am

what movie is that from?

Rambizzle · Post by **Rambizzle** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:40 am

hahaha sears avi is great

CharlieGiteau · Post by **CharlieGiteau** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:41 am

Sears wrote:what movie is that from?

Stephen King's "IT".

Sears · Post by **Sears** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:46 am

[youtube]FhbrLjcAPw0[/youtube]

Has any stephen king movie ever been good in the history of ever?

seaNsk · Post by **seaNsk** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:47 am

This thread needs more of hXc defending the accused... (or in this case, the banned)

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:50 am

seaN wrote:This thread needs more of hXc defending the accused... (or in this case, the banned)

He already brought up his history of defending Stamp.

Show of hands, who is surprised by that?

*Crickets*

Thought so.

seaNsk · Post by **seaNsk** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:53 am

Still....

seaN wrote:needs more

Rambizzle · Post by **Rambizzle** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:55 am

seaN wrote:Still....

seaN wrote:needs more

Swiss · Post by **Swiss** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:57 am

Rambizzle wrote:
seaN wrote:Still....

seaN wrote:needs more

Post by **ThatsRight** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:10 am

dorraj wrote:
Marshall_D wrote:i feel this need to call jarrod fat and ugly. please explain
You mad, faggot? I feel the need to call*. You're stupid, eh?

[youtube]y4XmI0eBiMQ[/youtube]

Post by **ThatsRight** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:35 am

Seems obvious to me. Personal vendentta or not I'd still like to see TPG release demos of people they ban. There have been questionable bans before.. In CAL and TPG.

The ac admins should never have to disclose evidence or how they came to their conclusion. The community and league has already appointed them and trusted their knowledge and expirence of the game.

Auditors don't lay every thing out when they uncover fraud. That's a good recipe for people to understand your processes....and if they understand what you look for, and how, then they can come up with better ways to get around you. Another reason is there's still other open cases. You don't want to alert and tip off people. You want them to coninue so they dig their own grave.

But there really isn't anything stopping the individual who was banned from releasing their demos and helping them in the court of public opinion.

Swiss · Post by **Swiss** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:36 am

the idea of admins sending out demos after a person is banned is a terrible idea, leading to countless bitching, second guessing, questioning....etc. isnt this obvious?

Post by **ThatsRight** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:39 am

That's going to happen anyways though.

Swiss · Post by **Swiss** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:45 am

right. so if admins are the ones doing it, then it becomes expected from the community that the admins hand it out when requested, or if denied, they just end up being pestered whenever anyone wants to see them. having the demos float around after someone posts it/sends it is completely different from the standpoint of a league

Post by **Black Hawk** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:33 pm

There wasnt enough evidence to ban me for cheating
There WAS for Stamp.
So I got banned because stamp cheated and the evidence showed he did. Weather you share the demos or not, I got banned on stamps behalf. Sure it sucks but i doubt theyll let me put up a fight against it knowing Narc will just bitch about how im disrespecting an admin or some shit. If I got banned on stamps behalf I think we need to half a little talk about it, I dont think thats fair. If Ng still lived in this house I doubt you'd ban him too.

hXc · Post by **hXc** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:37 pm

alex kirk wrote:
seaN wrote:This thread needs more of hXc defending the accused... (or in this case, the banned)
He already brought up his history of defending Stamp.

Show of hands, who is surprised by that?

*Crickets*

Thought so.

I meant that I defended them for being picked on because of their age. I know they had been cheating. I was one of the players that told jrod to submit the demo that got Stamp banned. Lol.

Post by **Black Hawk** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:40 pm

That got us both banned. Dick.

british · Post by **british** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:41 pm

Black Hawk wrote: If Ng still lived in this house I doubt you'd ban him too.

There's a third stamp?

[Enter end of the world GIF here]

british · Post by **british** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:43 pm

Black Hawk wrote:That got us both banned. Dick.

To be fair though, if you guys both play on the same computer and he has cheats on the computer for himself. Pretty sure you would use them too, or am i just jumping to conclusions here?

Post by **Black Hawk** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:46 pm

That doesn't mean I do. I wanna see Ryan and Corey get banned and see that "brothers" rule get turned over pretty fast

kirk · Post by **kirk** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:48 pm

Black Hawk wrote:That doesn't mean I do. I wanna see Ryan and Corey get banned and see that "brothers" rule get turned over pretty fast

Did you or did you not cheat?