NHL Troll

nunz · Post by **nunz** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:17 pm

So there is this new rule in the NHL and this appears to be a troll to take the rule away, I laughed.
CONJgZjVOh8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CONJgZjV ... r_embedded

stile · Post by **stile** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:20 pm

it'd help to post the rule

Fleener · Post by **Fleener** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:58 pm

I believe the rule he's talking about is that a player will now be penalized if he removes his helmet before a fight. To get around this rule, the two fighters softly remove the other's helmet before throwing down.

nunz · Post by **nunz** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 9:02 pm

stile wrote:it'd help to post the rule

I dont exactly know the exact wording of it but its along the lines of a player cant remove his own helmet to engage a fight, which in turn would force the players to fight with their helmets on. You can see they move eachother helmets after talking about it to fight without their helmets on. They did it 3 times.

acetamino · Post by **acetamino** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 9:18 pm

Wh at about that rule sayin you can't tuck your jersey in.

british · Post by **british** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:29 pm

Ive never really seen a hockey match before. It amazes me that the refs actually let you fight..

nunz · Post by **nunz** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:17 am

british wrote:Ive never really seen a hockey match before. It amazes me that the refs actually let you fight..

its a canadian thing. we are ones to hold grudges and in hockey we settle thinga with fists not stamp like trash talk.

SpoonIsBad · Post by **SpoonIsBad** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 7:19 am

I hate that rule, it's so dumb. So you get a penalty for instigating with a visor. Now you get penalized for taking your helmet off... Fucking stupid.

Post by **TonyMontana** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 11:00 am

NHL clearly needs some sort of client while in-game

hypnotik_ · Post by **hypnotik_** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:21 pm

I thought it was going to be a rule about fake fighting then I read fleener's comment

Jakimo · Post by **Jakimo** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:01 pm

british wrote:Ive never really seen a hockey match before. It amazes me that the refs actually let you fight..

welcome to canada. we invented hockey. nuff said

Cage · Post by **Cage** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:25 pm

Jakimo wrote:nuff said

ward · Post by **ward** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:34 pm

Cage wrote:
Jakimo wrote:nuff said

Maybe they've been too busy fighting to practice? LOL

Todo · Post by **Todo** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 7:07 pm

Cage wrote:
Jakimo wrote:nuff said

Second rate tourney for the guys whose teams didn't make the playoffs and have nothing better to do.

tugger · Post by **tugger** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 7:20 pm

Cage wrote:
Jakimo wrote:nuff said

Canada won the gold medal 4 or 5 years or so in a row...

nunz · Post by **nunz** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 9:06 pm

Cage wrote:
Jakimo wrote:nuff said

as good as sweden is that is a complete bs tourney of bad players. the best are busy in the NHL playing in the SC playoffs. olympic champs are Canada thank you :p and this will all settle come olympic time.

Post by **TonyMontana** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 9:41 pm

Yes.
To those who don't know.
The World Hockey Championships are for players that are NOT in the Stanley Cup Playoffs....
Pretty much meaningless considering its a toss up who will even play.

The Olympics are all that matter
And we all know how those went / will go

Canada is going to win it again, sorry.

Hey wanna hear something crazy? My mom trains dogs professionally, she had this dog named "Marshall" a chocolate lab...I hung out with the dog a few times, she goes "You should stick around for when the owner comes by to say hi"

So i did...

And it was Tyler Seguin
LMAO WTF

Todo · Post by **Todo** » Sat Sep 21, 2013 12:00 am

TonyMontana wrote:Canada is going to win it again, sorry.

First time in my life that we (the US) have had such a clear advantage at goalie. Should be interesting.

nunz · Post by **nunz** » Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:08 am

Todo wrote:
TonyMontana wrote:Canada is going to win it again, sorry.
First time in my life that we (the US) have had such a clear advantage at goalie. Should be interesting.

Its not only clear its massive. I truely believe that the USA are the favourites going into this one in my opinion. I think they have alot of depth which is something they never did have. They also have superstars like Patty Kane who can carry them to gold. Go Canada!

SKiNnTo · Post by **SKiNnTo** » Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:50 am

New Rules eh?

nunz · Post by **nunz** » Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:51 am

SKiNnTo wrote:New Rules eh?

sup3rv1rg1n420p4l3n3rd · Sat Sep 21, 2013 8:52 am

U.S hockey is on the rise.

defiance · Post by **defiance** » Sat Sep 21, 2013 9:25 am

the russian red army will not be stopped in 2014.

Jstampz · Post by **Jstampz** » Sat Sep 21, 2013 11:59 pm

nunz wrote:
british wrote:Ive never really seen a hockey match before. It amazes me that the refs actually let you fight..
its a canadian thing. we are ones to hold grudges and in hockey we settle thinga with fists not stamp like trash talk.

Your girlfriend said I was sexier than you

nunz · Post by **nunz** » Sun Sep 22, 2013 2:28 pm

Jstampz wrote:
nunz wrote:
british wrote:Ive never really seen a hockey match before. It amazes me that the refs actually let you fight..
its a canadian thing. we are ones to hold grudges and in hockey we settle thinga with fists not stamp like trash talk.

Your girlfriend said I was sexier than you

ur mom said u have a small dick

1911 Beta

NHL Troll

NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll

Re: NHL Troll