Tournament DoD

stile · Post by **stile** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:39 am

Would you guys be down for something like this? Of course there wouldn't be any prizes other than bragging rights, but the thought of being eliminated after one or two matches would probably influence some teams to try a little bit harder. Since it would run shorter than a normal season it might result in different pugs being formed for the hell of it.

james- · Post by **james-** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 12:57 pm

Why don't we make a 4th league and everyone tag up [DoD4CPL]?

stile · Post by **stile** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:10 pm

Great input.

cassinoroyale · Post by **cassinoroyale** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:33 pm

We tried to do this here in SA when we had 16-20 teams... It didn't work out because the losing teams ended up losing their interest on the game while they were waiting for another season to come. Not to mention that even if you have a good seeding match creation you will probably put low vs high which in most of the cases will make these low seed teams get spanked.

stile · Post by **stile** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:35 pm

You didn't do double elimination?

cassinoroyale · Post by **cassinoroyale** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 2:39 pm

Not on the very first but we did on the following...

unpro · Post by **unpro** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 6:59 pm

Just shorten tpg to 6 weeks and a fast playoffs between the top 4-6 teams and tournaments really wont be any different :p

cassinoroyale · Post by **cassinoroyale** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:00 pm

unpro wrote:Just shorten tpg to 6 weeks and a fast playoffs between the top 4-6 teams and tournaments really wont be any different :p

8 weeks again would be perfect imo

hellfire · Post by **hellfire** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:03 pm

anything is possible

mogers · Post by **mogers** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 8:12 pm

See what teams would be interested in playing. Rank them accordingly. Round Robin for playoff seeds. Double elimination. Whole process should take approximately 8 years.

unpro · Post by **unpro** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 7:52 am

Seems like a reasonable expectation on the time frame.

scorch- · Post by **scorch-** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 8:18 am

everything is made from dreams

toxinatoR · Post by **toxinatoR** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 8:23 am

Matt Rogers is in my dreams.

sevEN · Post by **sevEN** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:08 am

i like the idea. it would take a lot of work, and structure, but it could work. if we had 6-7 servers up and running at once, with 4-5 "admins," we could knock it out in a weekend. i figure that is when we would have the most players and teams available compared to mid week. i imagine it being very similar to a lan tournament structure, only online of course.

JaGGoNdd · Post by **JaGGoNdd** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:19 am

im down

rdk · Post by **rdk** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:38 am

we should do a tourni where every player is given a rank based on skill and teams are selected to even the odds so shitty pug players(like myself) get the chance to play with players better than themselves. might cause players to realize not every1 in this game is a fgt. just 99%.

ryanemo · Post by **ryanemo** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:42 am

or could do a draft of some sort then a tourny afterwards, could be fun i suppose

rdk · Post by **rdk** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:59 am

yea something like that, i think it be fun to play with a bunch of diff ppl

unpro · Post by **unpro** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 12:59 pm

Thats like not expecting the same people to be together in 12mans over and over. You will end up with 1 or 2 teams that manage to get more of the better players. You have the mental stats, and the 12man knowledge of most of the dod community thats active. Why not have a group of active people arbitrarily make teams? Mixing the bad players like stamp and blackhawk in with the good players like tox and austin? That way you can basically force a relatively even playing field instead of hoping you dont get fucked in a picking order in a draft like system. Of course this would require a list of whos down and acknowledgement of "ill play regardless of who im with" from everyone. No switching, no refusing to play because someones 'so bad!', etc.

Personally i think that would be fun.

rymoz · Post by **rymoz** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 1:08 pm

unpro wrote:Mixing the bad players like stamp and blackhawk in

unpro · Post by **unpro** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 1:19 pm

See, thats the issue. You cant have a draft system and expect remotely fair teams with that view on it. It would end up pretty much with the teams that exist now + maybe a good player mixed in with bad ones if they are lucky. The winning team would be known before it even started. Why bother going through the trouble if your just going to replicate current teams?

rdk · Post by **rdk** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:05 pm

well youd have to have a set number of who would be down, then a roster limit like 8 or 9 to see how many teams there would be. really bad players would end up probably being backups,...or starters depending on who is down to play

unpro · Post by **unpro** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:23 pm

7 man teams, rotate the 6th betwen the 2 last picks. And i already said it would require a list.

1911 Beta

Tournament DoD

Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD

Re: Tournament DoD