The GOAT

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The GOAT

Re: The GOAT

by sevEN » Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:32 am

vpaz wrote: It's not about if Manning has enough MVP awards already, if he earns it, he earns it. I don't see how you can sit here and say AP deserves the MVP more then Manning does.
honestly, i agree. if he earns it, he earns it. but there is a group of real life people that vote for the MVP. and some voters hold different things to a higher standard than other voters when it comes to the MVP voting. some of them think it's the #1 best player in the league. some would argue it is the one who was the most important to their team. some take into consideration other factors that other voters dont. what im getting at is that you never know the reasons why a voter will vote the way they do. considering that 2 of mannings MVPs were pretty much given to him by default, that is something that can and will factor into the thoughts of voters. so the fact that manning already has a ton IS in fact something that can be taken into consideration. im not saying its going to be the end all factor in the decision, but these voters are real ppl like us and have these kinds of thoughts before casting their vote.

anyways, my comments were more so just a manifestation of my frustration with how the MVP voting has turned out in recent years. it's obvious they tend to give it to one of the top 3-4 QBs on either of the top 1 or 2 teams in the league. and we finally have a NON QB who has performed more than well enough to earn it, and i think it's a good time to give it to him.

im not trying to argue that manning doesnt deserve it. i am just trying to argue that he doesn't deserve it as much as adrian peterson this year.

btw, i'll just leave this right here for you guys...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... onth-ever/

Re: The GOAT

by Theworst » Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:48 pm

vpaz wrote:
sevEN wrote:
Thebest wrote:Manning has enough MVP awards already. When I was watching the game, part of me wanted them to miss the field goal so he could get the yards he needed in OT but another part of me just wanted to see the vikings win the game to clinch a playoff berth after an amazing season #28 has had. I really don't see a reason why AP doesn't deserve MVP but as you said, it's been a QB award for a long while now, just have to wait and see. Also, if ponder can play as well or better than he did in the game today from this point on, I can see the vikings doing really well in the playoffs.
i agree with every single word. and thank you for showing a little respect... nice to see someone who knows football be able to analyze the team, even on general level, and see that they have potential to do something. with how our D is playing, how we are running the ball, and obviously our kicking game, all we need ponder to do is not turn it over and convert some 3rd downs and we can seriously beat any team in the league on any given day.

It's not about if Manning has enough MVP awards already, if he earns it, he earns it. I don't see how you can sit here and say AP deserves the MVP more then Manning does. Sure AP rushed for 2000 yards and almost broke the record, sure he came back from an injury and did all of that. Guess who else came back from injury? Manning, and while he didn't rush for 2000 yards he did lead his team to a 13-3 record tied for first in the NFL with the Falcons, all of that while being doubted by everyone that he could still play, his arm was done etc, etc. They both deserve the MVP but to sit there and say Manning has enough MVPS and shouldn't get this one even though he earned it as much as AP did, is kind of a shit move.


Just because i don't agree with you Joey, doesn't mean i don't know football.
My comment about Manning having enough MVP awards wasn't really suppose to be taken seriously. Anyone playing as well as Manning and Peterson deserves a lot of consideration for season MVP. I was merely just saying that seeing someone other than a QB winning the award would be something new. Manning has 4 MVP awards and he deserved each and everyone of them.

The preperation the Vikings are doing for the Green Bay game shows me they really want to make a point in the post-season. They opened all their practice facility doors to let in all the outside cold and turned on the AC so they could practice in conditions they will be playing in on Saturday. They really want it this year, since it's their first post-season showing since 2009.

Kinda worried tho, Peterson didn't fully participate in practice due to his abdomen and Ponder has a hurt elbow, like to see them get better before the game so the packers can lose to them again(I hate the packers, fuck aaron rodgers)

Blah blah blah go Matt Ryan!

Re: The GOAT

by sevEN » Tue Jan 01, 2013 2:12 pm

Thebest wrote:Manning has enough MVP awards already. When I was watching the game, part of me wanted them to miss the field goal so he could get the yards he needed in OT but another part of me just wanted to see the vikings win the game to clinch a playoff berth after an amazing season #28 has had. I really don't see a reason why AP doesn't deserve MVP but as you said, it's been a QB award for a long while now, just have to wait and see. Also, if ponder can play as well or better than he did in the game today from this point on, I can see the vikings doing really well in the playoffs.
i agree with every single word. and thank you for showing a little respect... nice to see someone who knows football be able to analyze the team, even on general level, and see that they have potential to do something. with how our D is playing, how we are running the ball, and obviously our kicking game, all we need ponder to do is not turn it over and convert some 3rd downs and we can seriously beat any team in the league on any given day.

Re: The GOAT

by The Bear » Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:18 pm

This is the first thing I thought of when i saw the title of this thread. 9IhNuUjK6CI

Re: The GOAT

by Theworst » Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:11 pm

Manning has enough MVP awards already. When I was watching the game, part of me wanted them to miss the field goal so he could get the yards he needed in OT but another part of me just wanted to see the vikings win the game to clinch a playoff berth after an amazing season #28 has had. I really don't see a reason why AP doesn't deserve MVP but as you said, it's been a QB award for a long while now, just have to wait and see. Also, if ponder can play as well or better than he did in the game today from this point on, I can see the vikings doing really well in the playoffs.

Re: The GOAT

by sevEN » Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:24 pm

i know man.... really bummed he didnt get it but obviously making the playoffs is a bigger deal. i just hope he gets the MVP. after this performance, i dont see how he cant. although they dont call it the MVQB for nothing... wouldnt surprise me if they give it to manning but i'd still be furious if they did.

Re: The GOAT

by Theworst » Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:01 pm

9 yards Joey. At least they made it into the playoffs. Still a hell of a season and getting the vikings into the post season.

Re: The GOAT

by RoNiX » Tue Dec 25, 2012 11:35 am

john riggins.

just closed this thread down! boom_chaka_laka!

Re: The GOAT

by knockout » Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:33 pm

But yet way ahead in yards per carry and yards per game.

Re: The GOAT

by CharlieGiteau » Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:49 am

Polak wrote:Chris Johnson's 2009 stats:

Att Yards TD long yd/c yd/g att/g rec yards avg td long rec/g rey/g Total all purpose yards
358 2006 14 91 5.6 125.4 22.4 50 503 10.1 2 69 3.1 31.4 2509


Adrian Peterson 2012 Stats
289 1812 11 82 6.3 129.4 20.6 38 211 5.6 0 20 2.7 15.1 2023

Adrian Peterson is almost 500 all purpose yards away from Chris Johnsons years and 5 TDs away.
You also have to question whether or not AP is the "complete back" before he's named the GOAT, being able to pick up a solid block on a LB or corner blitz to give his questionable QB the extra time he needs to complete a pass play, and yeah, the receiving yards as well. The ability to get open for short passes over the middle when coverage is otherwise good, and 500 all purpose yards (given there are 2 games remaining) seem like a lot, but it honestly depends on the OC too.

Re: The GOAT

by Polak » Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:02 am

Chris Johnson's 2009 stats:

Att Yards TD long yd/c yd/g att/g rec yards avg td long rec/g rey/g Total all purpose yards
358 2006 14 91 5.6 125.4 22.4 50 503 10.1 2 69 3.1 31.4 2509


Adrian Peterson 2012 Stats
289 1812 11 82 6.3 129.4 20.6 38 211 5.6 0 20 2.7 15.1 2023

Adrian Peterson is almost 500 all purpose yards away from Chris Johnsons years and 5 TDs away.

Re: The GOAT

by Miller` » Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:42 am

sevEN wrote:
Miller` wrote:AP is a couple seasons away before entering it. Peyton Manning and Tom Brady are just getting there now.
i feel like AP is entering it and manning/brady have been there for a while now. i mean, manning was voted 8th best player in nfl history, and that was after the 2010 season.
You pretty much highlighted my point. The talk is normally done by the talking heads and, having helped dictate the talking heads, I can tell you that AP will be discussed after this year as one of the best ever but they will all say he hasn't won a championship and needs a few more years. Manning, when we was voted the 8th best player, was still 34 at the time so not a spring chicken.

knockout wrote: I dunno about that- I mean, maybe for baseball players. Football players at the skill positions usually duck out around 32/33, regardless of whether they play past that age or not. I don't know that any RB has had a Pro Bowl deserving year at 35.
That range is not exact. Obviously the shelf-life for a RB is much shorter and also starts earlier than a QB (at least it used to, not so much any more). Hell, Sweetness retired around 32. But again, AP is still 27, not 32. He has more years in what is expected to be his prime.

If I were to be asked who had the most talent in the NFL, I'd give you one set of players. If I were to be asked who had the best career, I'd give you another set of players. If I were to be asked who was the greatest of all time, I'd give yet another set of players, but they'd trend more towards those who accomplished more on the field over their career than those that did not.

The statement was greatest of all time, not who had the best season. Otherwise Drew Brees is #1.

Drew Breeeeeeeeees

Re: The GOAT

by knockout » Thu Dec 20, 2012 12:59 am

Who said anything about 38? How they do from 25-35 is normally their prime and if somebody ducks out before that then their overall lustre will be tarnished.
I dunno about that- I mean, maybe for baseball players. Football players at the skill positions usually duck out around 32/33, regardless of whether they play past that age or not. I don't know that any RB has had a Pro Bowl deserving year at 35.

Re: The GOAT

by knockout » Thu Dec 20, 2012 12:51 am

too many walls of text, but
Reliability is my point. What about Chris Johnson scorch? His prime season (2009) is better than any of AP's but AP is a better running back still. You have to have to take stats and longevity (to a certain extent) into consideration
I think I have to disagree and say AP's 2012 is better than Chris Johnson's 2009

Re: The GOAT

by sevEN » Wed Dec 19, 2012 9:58 pm

knockout wrote:Why mention carries when AP averages 6.3 YPC? SIX. POINT. THREE. IN THE NFL. WHEN THE OTHER TEAM KNOWS THAT CHRISTIAN PONDER IS YOUR QUARTERBACK.

Also, Dan hasn't followed football since Johnny Unitas retired gg rofl you're old420
I appreciate the caps and the broken sentences with periods to put emphasis on just how fucking insane of a season he is having. here are some great points regarding what he's doing. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1449 ... ryone-else
scorch- wrote: Don't bother arguing with vpaz. Kid's a retard. I haven't followed football since the Rams left LA, but Bo Jackson was the best gg. 4.12 40 at 220 lbs, if it weren't for that freak hip injury...
i definitely acknowledge how insanely talented, physically gifted, and athletic bo jackson was. and it is a shame he couldnt stick with football and/or avoid that hip injury. but peterson is starting to put together such a complete body of work at this point in his career that after this season, we need to start looking at his place among the greatest RB of all time, not just in the game today. bo jackson has such a small sample size and incomplete body of work in the nfl that it is hard to include him in such discussions, unless we are talking about potential or physical freaks.
SKiNnTo wrote:He can't be the "GOAT" yet, needs more time in the league. And I don't think he'll be in the league in 7-8 years. 3-4 years is the average for an NFL player.
if you are comparing adrian peterson to the "average player" in the nfl as far as years played, then you really don't know how to judge a player. the average player would still be rehabbing his knee injury. AP is breaking the rushing record. he is obviously a very special player. unless he sustains another 1 or 2 devastating, career threatening type injuries, i guarantee you he will be in the league in 7 years. take that one to the bank.
Miller` wrote:Bo Jackson was the most talented, but not the GOAT because of that injury. Much like Barry Sanders may have beent he GOAT but quit about three years too soon.

GOAT = Jerry Rice then Walter Payton.

AP has a chance, just needs more time and not get injured again.

By the way, Calvin Johnson has a chance to break the single-season receiving record and also has nothing else going on for him.
i still wouldnt consider bo jackson the "most talented". i would say he was the best athlete and most physically gifted... but it's hard to compare "talent". one could say tom brady is much more "talented" than bo jackson, yet they are nowhere near the same planet when it comes to being an athlete. im actually surprised that bo jackson is getting so much love in a "greatest running back of all time" debate. there isnt a single football historian or football analyst that would name bo jackson if you asked him "tell me your top 5 running backs of all time" and i'd go as far as to say 99% wouldnt include him if you asked for the top 10.

barry sanders would probably take the cake if not for retiring too soon, as you mentioned.

and jerry rice the greatest player?? ehhhhhh i have a different opinion on jerry rice. jerry rice had such amazing hall of famers around him for his entire career. he was also a VERY big beneficiary of walsh's west coast offense which was so new at the time that defenses didnt have a way to defend it for such a long time. very much a system player imo. you can plug in another above average WR and he could have put up close to the same numbers as jerry rice given he played as long. not saying he isnt one of the greatest of all time, but i dont hold him as high as most do.

and calvin johnson is having an incredible year also. but... it just doesnt compare to what AP is doing. johnson is being defended by 2 guys at a time and being thrown to by an elite QB. adrian peterson is being defended by 8 and 9 in the box and is beating them on a consistent basis, despite the entire stadium knowing he is getting the ball. lions actually have a good amount of weapons to compliment calvin johnson. vikings will throw gerhart for the very occasional screen pass on 3rd and 22, but that's it. a team can pass aaaallll day long and if they are good at it, they can get away with it. no need for a run game. just ask the pats. but for a team like the vikings who runs runs runs, that is something that is NOT supposed to work. not at all. but it does because we have the best rb in the league by far.
showtime wrote: +1. I'd put Jim Brown right up there in the greatest RB conversation though, maybe even ahead of Payton. Only played 8 or 9 years which probably hurt him plus they only had 14 games in a season back then.
jim brown has to be up there for sure. but one thing to consider about jim brown is that he played at a time when he weighed 240 and ran a 4.3, and every single dude on the field trying to tackle him were playing football as a 2nd job and went to work to support the family. over time and after watching countless jim brown highlights, ive come to the conclusion that he was a giant strong RB who could run fast in a straight line once he got going, and was playing against 170 lb middle school teachers and construction workers who suited up on sundays on their day off. but you cant keep him out of the top 5 even if you tried. if my memory is correct, he lead the league in rushing every single year he played. that is just absurd.

walter payton is probably my pick for best running back of all time if i had to choose one.
Polak wrote:AP has been the best running back the last five years.
He will go into the Hall of Fame and he might be the GOAT when it comes to the RB position if he keeps it up for another five.

He still needs a few years to be put passed Marshal Faulk, Emmith Smith, Barry Sanders, Walter Payton and who knows if he will ever touch Jim Brown who averaged more than a TD per game.

I would say he's about to Pass OJ Simpson when it comes to the all time greats. I'm sorry Joey but you are too much of a Vikings fan which makes you overly biased to the situation. The Guy is amazing, but it's been only five years. I might consider LT to be better. He set so many records over a span of four years and he's barley in the TOP 10
i agree with pretty much everything you said, but i dont think i am being overly biased. when i made the thread, i didnt mean to make it seem like i was literally touting him as the #1 greatest of all time. i was just excited to get a discussion going about him and his accomplishments this season. but he is at the point where you need to start considering him very high in the conversation when you take into account all of the different factors surrounding his situation and entire career.

and to be clear, he is 2 games from finishing his 6th season. jim brown is considered by most to be the GOAT after just playing 9. i think after the 6 seasons AP has had, we can put him in the same conversation and eventually put him atop of the conversation after another 4-5.
scorch- wrote:I think you're all dumb if you think longevity and accomplishments are part of the equation. Greatest of All Time means if you could pick any player (in their prime) to play a position on your team right now, who would it be?
this reminds me of the qualifications to make the hall of fame. or even the MVP award. there are a certain number of voters, and each one of them have different criteria that they use to judge a player and make a decision. they also have much different interpretations of the meaning of MVP or GOAT. i think what you just described dan has to be asked more specifically, just like you just phrased it. if you ask it that way, and you are asking for a RB at the top of his prime, bo jackson will be very high on that list for a lot of people. but for me it has to do with the entire body of work. there are so many things that go into wether or not a player is great. i like to take into consideration eeeeeeeeeeeeverything from stats, to superbowls, to longevity, to consistency, to performance in big games, to raw talent, to physical abilities, to mental toughness and attitude, to what he does to the opposing defenses and/or defensive coordinators.. and those are just a few off the top of my head. so many things. and if you break them down individually, you might have a different running back who is the best at each category. but i feel like it's about the players who are at or near the top of as many categories as possible. so that when you combine all of that into 1, you get a player that is the greatest or one of the greatest.
scorch- wrote:it was mostly just poking fun at the hardcore vikings homer posting about his team's running back having a great season.
homer? gimme a break. i definitely do not qualify as a homer. anyone who has talked football with me over the years knows that i am a realist when it comes to the vikings and i just say it how it is. and my unbiased opinion is that AP is entering the point in his career where we can start putting him in the conversation of greatest of all time. and im sure there are plenty of packers and bears "homers" who would agree with me after the beatings they have been taking for the past 6 years and will take the next 6-7.
Polak wrote: "Some consider the 2009 season of Chris Johnson to be one of the best ever in NFL history for a running back.[13] He rushed for 2,006 yards[14] to become one of only six players in NFL history to be in the 2000 rushing yards club. He averaged 5.6 yards per carry and 125.4 yards per game to lead the league.[15] He had 2,509 total yards from scrimmage, breaking Marshall Faulk's single-season record.
if you think he had such an incredible season, just realize that AP is on pace and about to crush every one of those stats you just mentioned. just sayin.
Miller` wrote:AP is a couple seasons away before entering it. Peyton Manning and Tom Brady are just getting there now.
i disagree with that statement a little bit. i feel like AP is entering it and manning/brady have been there for a while now. i mean, manning was voted 8th best player in nfl history, and that was after the 2010 season.

-------------------------

anyways... i am an obsessive football fanatic and i have very much enjoyed reading through and responding to a lot of your posts. im glad this thread got so much input and opinions.

Re: The GOAT

by cassinoroyale » Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:08 pm

nerds

Re: The GOAT

by scorch- » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:21 pm

See, to me longevity is really just a tiebreaker. Now, the question you have to ask yourself is what made Chris Johnson so good for that one season? If you took him in his prime and put him in the league today, would he be good? Did he stop training as hard or did teams figure him out after one season? Did he not understand the game well enough to adapt?

There are a lot of aspects that you can argue makes/breaks who was the better player. I don't think "how long he was good" can be used as a prime indicator, although I'll agree that it could be used as evidence of certain areas of skill that should be considered.

Re: The GOAT

by Polak » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:04 pm

Miller` wrote:
scorch- wrote: I didn't seriously expect anyone to think that Bo Jackson was the best ever... it was mostly just poking fun at the hardcore vikings homer posting about his team's running back having a great season.

You cite his yards per season... His average yards per 16-game season was a little under 1200 while getting 20-30% of his team's carries for 3 of the 4 seasons he played. If he had been the #1 running back and played 16 games, that scales to 1800-2000 yards per season. During his career, he just happened to be the backup for one of the best running backs ever and get injured before he became the star.

I really don't know how to argue with Polak. You clearly consider "greatest" differently than I do. My standard has always been, if I had to choose one person to do X in their prime, who would I pick? WRT Jordan, you didn't even answer the question, and I'm guessing because the answer is "No". I also think you misunderstand what I mean by "reliability". I don't mean being able to do well year-to-year, I mean that if you took that player at their best, how reliably could they or did they perform at that level. Could you rely on them to perform well if you picked them for your team?

Artists are completely different than athletes. Music is something where you improve with time, you don't have a prime and then struggle against your failing body.
I think we agree on the prime, but disagree with the point of longevity. To me, it is the longevity of that prime which should be considered as opposed to simple longevity. Jordan's return hurt his image, Kobe is getting to that point now, but they both had very, very long primes and their longevity of that helped them out.

Jerry Rice had 1200 yards receiving in his 17th season in the NFL . That is longevity, that is a very long prime, and that is being the best (2 MVP, 3 Super Bowls) during your prime. To me, you need dominant longevity during your prime to be considered GOAT. AP is a couple seasons away before entering it. Peyton Manning and Tom Brady are just getting there now.
That's the page I'm on, or at least trying to say myself. Kudos to you.

Re: The GOAT

by Miller` » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:00 pm

scorch- wrote: I didn't seriously expect anyone to think that Bo Jackson was the best ever... it was mostly just poking fun at the hardcore vikings homer posting about his team's running back having a great season.

You cite his yards per season... His average yards per 16-game season was a little under 1200 while getting 20-30% of his team's carries for 3 of the 4 seasons he played. If he had been the #1 running back and played 16 games, that scales to 1800-2000 yards per season. During his career, he just happened to be the backup for one of the best running backs ever and get injured before he became the star.

I really don't know how to argue with Polak. You clearly consider "greatest" differently than I do. My standard has always been, if I had to choose one person to do X in their prime, who would I pick? WRT Jordan, you didn't even answer the question, and I'm guessing because the answer is "No". I also think you misunderstand what I mean by "reliability". I don't mean being able to do well year-to-year, I mean that if you took that player at their best, how reliably could they or did they perform at that level. Could you rely on them to perform well if you picked them for your team?

Artists are completely different than athletes. Music is something where you improve with time, you don't have a prime and then struggle against your failing body.
I expected that, just as I did not really believe that Sampson was the greatest ever. Hell, I went to UNC so no chance I'd pick a UVaer over Jordan.

I think we agree on the prime, but disagree with the point of longevity. To me, it is the longevity of that prime which should be considered as opposed to simple longevity. Jordan's return hurt his image, Kobe is getting to that point now, but they both had very, very long primes and their longevity of that helped them out.

Jerry Rice had 1200 yards receiving in his 17th season in the NFL . That is longevity, that is a very long prime, and that is being the best (2 MVP, 3 Super Bowls) during your prime. To me, you need dominant longevity during your prime to be considered GOAT. AP is a couple seasons away before entering it. Peyton Manning and Tom Brady are just getting there now.

Re: The GOAT

by Polak » Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:50 pm

I don't mean being able to do well year-to-year, I mean that if you took that player at their best, how reliably could they or did they perform at that level. Could you rely on them to perform well if you picked them for your team?
I think Chris Johnson is a great example for this. "Some consider the 2009 season of Chris Johnson to be one of the best ever in NFL history for a running back.[13] He rushed for 2,006 yards[14] to become one of only six players in NFL history to be in the 2000 rushing yards club. He averaged 5.6 yards per carry and 125.4 yards per game to lead the league.[15] He had 2,509 total yards from scrimmage, breaking Marshall Faulk's single-season record. He was named the NFL's Offensive Player of the Year in 2009. After his 2009 season, the media referred to him as "CJ2K", but has since lost that nickname due to under performing after receiving his new contract."

I don't think CJ can be put into the GOAT category, but based on your opinion for the title GOAT, from what I understand, you can.

Re: The GOAT

by Polak » Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:46 pm

Artists are completely different than athletes. Music is something where you improve with time, you don't have a prime and then struggle against your failing body.
DID YOU SEE ERIC CALPTON DURING THE 12.12.12 CONCERT????????

Re: The GOAT

by scorch- » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:59 pm

Miller` wrote:
scorch- wrote:I'm also not saying that I'm basing the evaluation on talent. I'm saying that if someone PROVES their ability over the course of several seasons, you should be evaluating them at their prime, not basing it on their ability to play at a high level when they're 38. Len Bias and Ralph Sampson were really good players with loads of potential, but you can't say they were the greatest based on potential, you can only look at what they actually did.
And yet you said that Bo Jackson was the best ever, I just played off of that statement. Jackson never rushed for more than 950 yards in a season while averaging about 600 yds/yr in four seasons.
I didn't seriously expect anyone to think that Bo Jackson was the best ever... it was mostly just poking fun at the hardcore vikings homer posting about his team's running back having a great season.

You cite his yards per season... His average yards per 16-game season was a little under 1200 while getting 20-30% of his team's carries for 3 of the 4 seasons he played. If he had been the #1 running back and played 16 games, that scales to 1800-2000 yards per season. During his career, he just happened to be the backup for one of the best running backs ever and get injured before he became the star.

I really don't know how to argue with Polak. You clearly consider "greatest" differently than I do. My standard has always been, if I had to choose one person to do X in their prime, who would I pick? WRT Jordan, you didn't even answer the question, and I'm guessing because the answer is "No". I also think you misunderstand what I mean by "reliability". I don't mean being able to do well year-to-year, I mean that if you took that player at their best, how reliably could they or did they perform at that level. Could you rely on them to perform well if you picked them for your team?

Artists are completely different than athletes. Music is something where you improve with time, you don't have a prime and then struggle against your failing body.

Re: The GOAT

by Miller` » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:20 pm

scorch- wrote:I'm also not saying that I'm basing the evaluation on talent. I'm saying that if someone PROVES their ability over the course of several seasons, you should be evaluating them at their prime, not basing it on their ability to play at a high level when they're 38. Len Bias and Ralph Sampson were really good players with loads of potential, but you can't say they were the greatest based on potential, you can only look at what they actually did.
And yet you said that Bo Jackson was the best ever, I just played off of that statement. Jackson never rushed for more than 950 yards in a season while averaging about 600 yds/yr in four seasons.

Who said anything about 38? How they do from 25-35 is normally their prime and if somebody ducks out before that then their overall lustre will be tarnished. Sanders retired at the age of 30 one year after rushing for 2000 yards and ran for 1000 yards in each of his 10 seasons. Image where he'd be ranked if he continued to rack up those numbers.

All I'm saying is that Adrian Peterson is 28 or so no 38, give him a few more years of doing this in his prime and then we'll talk GOAT.

Re: The GOAT

by Polak » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:08 pm

Pitching a perfect game is a confluence of events, some of which are not under the control of the pitcher. Also, your distortion ignores a valuable asset in any player... reliability.
Reliability is my point. What about Chris Johnson scorch? His prime season (2009) is better than any of AP's but AP is a better running back still. You have to have to take stats and longevity (to a certain extent) into consideration.
I mean, do you hold Jordan's comeback against him when you consider whether he was the best basketball player ever?
Jordan is the best and his stats shows it, he's also got a bunch of rings and gold medals and MVPs etc etc.

Jordan is the greatest athlete of all time, in my opinion and ESPNs opinion and various other peoples opinions. People look at how long he played, how he played, and what he accomplished. All three of those get looked at.

For fuck shakes you can take this outside of sports and see the top artists of all time and those take a whole bunch of variances as well. It's not just the highest records sold, or just one subject. There are many things to take into consideration.

Basically my point is you can't give someone the title GOAT because of a three year span of greatness.

Re: The GOAT

by scorch- » Wed Dec 19, 2012 12:44 pm

Polak wrote:Scorch I think you are dumb with this reasoning. Because with this logic you'd have to take all the pitchers who pitched one perfect game the greatest of all time.
That's not my logic at all, that's you trying to make my line of reasoning look bad by distorting it and creating a ridiculous "analogy".

Pitching a perfect game is a confluence of events, some of which are not under the control of the pitcher. Also, your distortion ignores a valuable asset in any player... reliability. If you pick a pitcher based on the fact that they threw a perfect game, how does that help you predict whether they will be the best choice to pitch in your game to save the world? There's a difference between evaluating a player as they perform against a sampling of teams in a league (someone who performs over 1-2 seasons) instead of looking at total career stats. I mean, do you hold Jordan's comeback against him when you consider whether he was the best basketball player ever?

I'm also not saying that I'm basing the evaluation on talent. I'm saying that if someone PROVES their ability over the course of several seasons, you should be evaluating them at their prime, not basing it on their ability to play at a high level when they're 38. Len Bias and Ralph Sampson were really good players with loads of potential, but you can't say they were the greatest based on potential, you can only look at what they actually did.

Re: The GOAT

by Polak » Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:48 am

scorch- wrote:I think you're all dumb if you think longevity and accomplishments are part of the equation. Greatest of All Time means if you could pick any player (in their prime) to play a position on your team right now, who would it be?
Scorch I think you are dumb with this reasoning. Because with this logic you'd have to take all the pitchers who pitched one perfect game the greatest of all time. And the greatest quaterbacks would be Joe Kapp, Y.A. Tittle, Adrian Burk, Sid Luckman who are the only ones to throw 7 touchdown games with ridiculous yardage. These moments are the best of the best and the very prime of a player.

GOAT is something achieved over a long period of time because their variance gets lowered, different players come in over the years and different greats. The NFL is not the same that it was 20 years ago and that also goes into affect.

Re: The GOAT

by showtime » Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:32 am

scorch- wrote:I think you're all dumb if you think longevity and accomplishments are part of the equation. Greatest of All Time means if you could pick any player (in their prime) to play a position on your team right now, who would it be?
Accomplishments/stats and a player's "prime" go hand in hand if we are talking about the GOAT conversation because there is probably a MVP, CY Young, record-breaking season, etc involved depending on the sport. This whole thread is getting stupid because everyone's opinion is different. I could just as easily say Terrell Davis is better than Curtis Martin using scorch's argument because he was better in his "prime". While most people would say that Curtis Martin has more yards, TDs, etc etc etc so he was the better player.
scorch- wrote:
Miller` wrote:Why not? Ralph Sampson was the greatest talent ever, but multiple injuries caused him to be taken out of the basketball equation early. Instead, some dude named Jordan gets the credit.
So you think that Ralph Sampson in his prime was better than Jordan in his prime?
I hope he is saying that Sampson never got to reach his full potential. Same with Len Bias.

Re: The GOAT

by scorch- » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:48 am

Miller` wrote:Why not? Ralph Sampson was the greatest talent ever, but multiple injuries caused him to be taken out of the basketball equation early. Instead, some dude named Jordan gets the credit.
So you think that Ralph Sampson in his prime was better than Jordan in his prime?

Re: The GOAT

by Miller` » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:45 am

Why not? Ralph Sampson was the greatest talent ever, but multiple injuries caused him to be taken out of the basketball equation early. Instead, some dude named Jordan gets the credit.

Re: The GOAT

by scorch- » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:20 am

I think you're all dumb if you think longevity and accomplishments are part of the equation. Greatest of All Time means if you could pick any player (in their prime) to play a position on your team right now, who would it be?

Re: The GOAT

by Polak » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:14 am

AP has been the best running back the last five years.
He will go into the Hall of Fame and he might be the GOAT when it comes to the RB position if he keeps it up for another five.

He still needs a few years to be put passed Marshal Faulk, Emmith Smith, Barry Sanders, Walter Payton and who knows if he will ever touch Jim Brown who averaged more than a TD per game.

I would say he's about to Pass OJ Simpson when it comes to the all time greats. I'm sorry Joey but you are too much of a Vikings fan which makes you overly biased to the situation. The Guy is amazing, but it's been only five years. I might consider LT to be better. He set so many records over a span of four years and he's barley in the TOP 10

Re: The GOAT

by showtime » Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:26 am

Miller` wrote:Bo Jackson was the most talented, but not the GOAT because of that injury. Much like Barry Sanders may have beent he GOAT but quit about three years too soon.

GOAT = Jerry Rice then Walter Payton.

AP has a chance, just needs more time and not get injured again.

By the way, Calvin Johnson has a chance to break the single-season receiving record and also has nothing else going on for him.
+1. I'd put Jim Brown right up there in the greatest RB conversation though, maybe even ahead of Payton. Only played 8 or 9 years which probably hurt him plus they only had 14 games in a season back then.

Re: The GOAT

by Miller` » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:42 am

Bo Jackson was the most talented, but not the GOAT because of that injury. Much like Barry Sanders may have beent he GOAT but quit about three years too soon.

GOAT = Jerry Rice then Walter Payton.

AP has a chance, just needs more time and not get injured again.

By the way, Calvin Johnson has a chance to break the single-season receiving record and also has nothing else going on for him.

Re: The GOAT

by knockout » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:32 am

Why mention carries when AP averages 6.3 YPC? SIX. POINT. THREE. IN THE NFL. WHEN THE OTHER TEAM KNOWS THAT CHRISTIAN PONDER IS YOUR QUARTERBACK.

Also, Dan hasn't followed football since Johnny Unitas retired gg rofl you're old420

Re: The GOAT

by rehpyc » Wed Dec 19, 2012 12:09 am

vpaz wrote:Retard that proved you wrong plenty of times. This is the guy that said if everyone stayed in-doors during hurricane sandy there would have been no deaths. What a joke.
Pretty sure him, myself, and ko merely pointed out that many people died because they either chose to go outside during extreme wind speeds or not evacuate their homes in major flood areas. Learn2read

Re: The GOAT

by toxinatoR » Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:39 pm

Gotta love HGH.

Re: The GOAT

by scorch- » Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:56 pm

vpaz wrote:Retard that proved you wrong plenty of times. This is the guy that said if everyone stayed in-doors during hurricane sandy there would have been no deaths. What a joke.
The only thing you've proved (and continue to prove now) is your inability to invoke the higher order brain processes required for logic and reasoning.

Re: The GOAT

by SKiNnTo » Tue Dec 18, 2012 2:23 pm

He can't be the "GOAT" yet, needs more time in the league. And I don't think he'll be in the league in 7-8 years. 3-4 years is the average for an NFL player.

Re: The GOAT

by scorch- » Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:31 pm

sevEN wrote:
vpaz wrote:
You already claimed him to be the GOAT, dipshit. Which is completely false, btw. There is plenty of other RB's who are and were better than AP, not to mention as many carries as AP gets which is more then 90% of every runningback in the NFL, there should be no reason why he can't put up numbers like that. There is no point in arguing with you because you've had AP's dick in your mouth for so long.
he will be, and i'm obviously a big fan, so i already call him that. but you cant tell me there is anyone in the game better tha adrian peterson. there hasnt been since he entered the league. and who cares about his carries? there are plenty of RBs that get much more carries than he does dude. and there is "no reason why" he cant put up numbers like that? how about having one of the league's worst passing games over the past 5-6 years (minus 2009 with brett favre, in which he ran for 18 TDs), with some of the worst quarter back play, and facing nothing but 8 and 9 man fronts. teams totally selling out against the run. and how about his knee being torn apart just 8 months prior to him starting the nfl season and rushing for 100+ and 2 scores, and being on pace to break the nfl single season rushing record less than 12 months removed from the injury? there is a point in arguing with me because i listen to logic and i am also intelligent enough to handle a discussion. but neither of your points are very good
Don't bother arguing with vpaz. Kid's a retard. I haven't followed football since the Rams left LA, but Bo Jackson was the best gg. 4.12 40 at 220 lbs, if it weren't for that freak hip injury...

Re: The GOAT

by milo » Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:36 am

Image

Re: The GOAT

by hildebrand » Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:15 am

i was about to post to this thread but then i remembered i was canadian.

Image

Re: The GOAT

by ao_ » Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:12 am

I am not an avid football fan and really do not follow statistics (actually I think fantasy football is dumb as shit), but I went to the Packers/Vikings game a few weekends ago and Adrian Peterson was unbelievable. He was basically the only thing that kept the Vikings in the game.

Re: The GOAT

by showtime » Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:40 am

sevEN wrote:
vpaz wrote:
You already claimed him to be the GOAT, dipshit. Which is completely false, btw. There is plenty of other RB's who are and were better than AP, not to mention as many carries as AP gets which is more then 90% of every runningback in the NFL, there should be no reason why he can't put up numbers like that. There is no point in arguing with you because you've had AP's dick in your mouth for so long.
he will be, and i'm obviously a big fan, so i already call him that. but you cant tell me there is anyone in the game better tha adrian peterson. there hasnt been since he entered the league. and who cares about his carries? there are plenty of RBs that get much more carries than he does dude. and there is "no reason why" he cant put up numbers like that? how about having one of the league's worst passing games over the past 5-6 years (minus 2009 with brett favre, in which he ran for 18 TDs), with some of the worst quarter back play, and facing nothing but 8 and 9 man fronts. teams totally selling out against the run. and how about his knee being torn apart just 8 months prior to him starting the nfl season and rushing for 100+ and 2 scores, and being on pace to break the nfl single season rushing record less than 12 months removed from the injury? there is a point in arguing with me because i listen to logic and i am also intelligent enough to handle a discussion. but neither of your points are very good
AP does get a ton of carries, but other than Percy Harvin he is the only other offensive weapon they have so they really don't have a choice. And even with everyone knowing he is getting the ball he still is averaging over 6 ypa so why not give him the ball 25+ times a game? That being said, I wouldn't say AP is the "greatest", but definitely the best RB in the NFL since LT's last year with the Chargers (AP's rookie year). The only person who might give him a run for his money is Arian Foster, but he does have the benefit of a great line and a decent passing game to balance it out.
nunz wrote:
milo wrote:Lionel Messi - 90 goals in a year

G.O.A.T
Lionel Messi World Cup Games 8, World Cup Goals 1. Nothing special, move along. It clearly shows that it pays to play in Spain and their terrible league.
jeSZWNtMKxA

Re: The GOAT

by sevEN » Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:06 am

vpaz wrote:
You already claimed him to be the GOAT, dipshit. Which is completely false, btw. There is plenty of other RB's who are and were better than AP, not to mention as many carries as AP gets which is more then 90% of every runningback in the NFL, there should be no reason why he can't put up numbers like that. There is no point in arguing with you because you've had AP's dick in your mouth for so long.
he will be, and i'm obviously a big fan, so i already call him that. but you cant tell me there is anyone in the game better tha adrian peterson. there hasnt been since he entered the league. and who cares about his carries? there are plenty of RBs that get much more carries than he does dude. and there is "no reason why" he cant put up numbers like that? how about having one of the league's worst passing games over the past 5-6 years (minus 2009 with brett favre, in which he ran for 18 TDs), with some of the worst quarter back play, and facing nothing but 8 and 9 man fronts. teams totally selling out against the run. and how about his knee being torn apart just 8 months prior to him starting the nfl season and rushing for 100+ and 2 scores, and being on pace to break the nfl single season rushing record less than 12 months removed from the injury? there is a point in arguing with me because i listen to logic and i am also intelligent enough to handle a discussion. but neither of your points are very good

Re: The GOAT

by james- » Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:59 pm

an interesting thread on 1911?

IMPOSSIBLE!

Oh and don't even start with the Bo vs. Prime Time arguments, they always end up at the same conclusion - the two shouldn't be compared.

Re: The GOAT

by nunz » Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:44 pm

milo wrote:Lionel Messi - 90 goals in a year

G.O.A.T
Lionel Messi World Cup Games 8, World Cup Goals 1. Nothing special, move along. It clearly shows that it pays to play in Spain and their terrible league.

Top